2013
DOI: 10.1007/s40037-013-0064-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ethics of cost analyses in medical education

Abstract: Cost analyses in medical education are rarely straightforward, and rarely lead to clear-cut conclusions. Occasionally they do lead to clear conclusions but even when that happens, some stakeholders will ask difficult but valid questions about what to do following cost analyses–specifically about distributive justice in the allocation of resources. At present there are few or no debates about these issues and rationing decisions that are taken in medical education are largely made subconsciously. Distributive j… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is a noted lack of methodological rigour and consistency in such analyses in health professions education. [7][8][9][10] With the need (why) for economic evaluation in SBME established, we join Lin et al in focusing on the detail (how) and consider the value of SBME as our departure point for discussion.…”
Section: It's Complicated!mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There is a noted lack of methodological rigour and consistency in such analyses in health professions education. [7][8][9][10] With the need (why) for economic evaluation in SBME established, we join Lin et al in focusing on the detail (how) and consider the value of SBME as our departure point for discussion.…”
Section: It's Complicated!mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cost and value analyses have the potential to determine the feasibility and sustainability of SBME. There is a noted lack of methodological rigour and consistency in such analyses in health professions education . With the need (why) for economic evaluation in SBME established, we join Lin et al.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%