2020
DOI: 10.1126/science.abc1076
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ethics of controlled human infection to address COVID-19

Abstract: High social value is fundamental to justifying these studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
119
0
5

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(124 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(11 reference statements)
0
119
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…SARS-CoV-2 CHIMs could minimize the uncertainty about exposure or disease acquisition inherent in field trials, thereby reducing the number of participants needed to establish the desired end point, and elucidate the duration of immunity conferred by vaccines undergoing field trials [108]. Importantly, ethical considerations related to SARS-CoV-2 CHIMs have been raised as to whether the societal benefits are sufficient to justify the risks posed by deliberately exposing humans to SARS-CoV-2 [109][110][111].…”
Section: Generating More Reliable Data Under Time Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SARS-CoV-2 CHIMs could minimize the uncertainty about exposure or disease acquisition inherent in field trials, thereby reducing the number of participants needed to establish the desired end point, and elucidate the duration of immunity conferred by vaccines undergoing field trials [108]. Importantly, ethical considerations related to SARS-CoV-2 CHIMs have been raised as to whether the societal benefits are sufficient to justify the risks posed by deliberately exposing humans to SARS-CoV-2 [109][110][111].…”
Section: Generating More Reliable Data Under Time Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to its design, the controlled nature of CHIM limits the possibility of generalizing to predict the effectiveness of a candidate vaccine against natural exposure. However, in order to justify this model, the first step is to demonstrate its high social value, since it generates not only great uncertainty but also controversy [6,11].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CHIM ethics are little explored, and the COVID-19 ethical processes have largely focused on whether the risks are acceptable and participants could give high-quality informed consent, using rigorous procedures to maximize understanding of the participants. In this informed consent process, the individual rights of the participants cannot be violated under the guise of an emergency response, but special attention must be paid to both individual rights and the global public health emergency [6,10,11].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, the global scale of the pandemic and associated morbidity and mortality may render even quite risky research objectively reasonable on the basis of high social value. For example, we have already seen vaccine trials proceed without the usual animal trials, and there is increasing discussion of using challenge trial design to speed vaccine development, a design far riskier for SARS-CoV-2 than for viruses used in other recent challenge trials given the lack of a proven cure [22][23][24][25]. It is widely accepted that trials can be justified on the basis of benefits to society; in the absence of direct benefits, it may be desirable to offer larger incentive payments similar to hazard pay offered to emergency workers or others performing dangerous work-as noted above, this can help make participation attractive across a wider socioeconomic swath [26].…”
Section: Incentivesmentioning
confidence: 99%