1999
DOI: 10.1080/02674659908405413
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ethics in research into human sexuality and into sexual and relationship therapy

Abstract: sexual functioning, sexual behaviour and sexual and relationship therapy. This paper reviews some of the ethical considerations in research relating to human

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…But, sex and intimate relationships between humans -ranging from flirting and courtship rituals, to partnered masturbation or sexual intercourse -can be sensitive and risky (Dir, Coskunpinar, & Cyders, 2014;Scott-Sheldon et al, 2013). These can also be particularly difficult to navigate safely and ethically in laboratory settings or natural environments (cf., Binik, Mah, & Kiesler, 1999;Masters, Johnson, & Kolodny, 1977;Masters, Johnson, Kolodny, & Weems, 1980;Munck, 1999;Price, Jansen, & Weick, 2020;Riley & Scott, 1999;Rosewarne, 2017;Rosoff, 2018;Shirmohammadi et al, 2018;Watter, 2020;Zhang et al, 2019). Hence, to protect research participants, and ensure that their studies comply with the ethical guidelines set by governments and research ethics boards, sex researchers must often rely on proxy or indirect methods to explore human sexuality.…”
Section: The Ethical and Methodological Challenges Of Sexologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But, sex and intimate relationships between humans -ranging from flirting and courtship rituals, to partnered masturbation or sexual intercourse -can be sensitive and risky (Dir, Coskunpinar, & Cyders, 2014;Scott-Sheldon et al, 2013). These can also be particularly difficult to navigate safely and ethically in laboratory settings or natural environments (cf., Binik, Mah, & Kiesler, 1999;Masters, Johnson, & Kolodny, 1977;Masters, Johnson, Kolodny, & Weems, 1980;Munck, 1999;Price, Jansen, & Weick, 2020;Riley & Scott, 1999;Rosewarne, 2017;Rosoff, 2018;Shirmohammadi et al, 2018;Watter, 2020;Zhang et al, 2019). Hence, to protect research participants, and ensure that their studies comply with the ethical guidelines set by governments and research ethics boards, sex researchers must often rely on proxy or indirect methods to explore human sexuality.…”
Section: The Ethical and Methodological Challenges Of Sexologymentioning
confidence: 99%