Being Profiled 2019
DOI: 10.1515/9789048550180-016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ethics As An Escape From Regulation. From “Ethics-Washing” To Ethics-Shopping?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
57
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
57
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The US Executive Order is an exception in that regard, although constitutes more a series of directions to government agencies rather than a detailed set of legally binding ethical principles. This situation overall leads to concerns about 'ethics washing' (Wagner 2018;Watts 2019) as mentioned earlier in relation to the EU High-Level Expert Panel activities, but on a broader scale: that ethics and governance initiatives without the binding force of law are mere 'window dressing' while unethical uses of AI by governments and corporations continue. Indeed, in various of the countries and regions we have examined, despite the existence of ethical guidelines on AI, unethical AI applications exist, which may fail a test against those very principles.…”
Section: Implementation and Enforceabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The US Executive Order is an exception in that regard, although constitutes more a series of directions to government agencies rather than a detailed set of legally binding ethical principles. This situation overall leads to concerns about 'ethics washing' (Wagner 2018;Watts 2019) as mentioned earlier in relation to the EU High-Level Expert Panel activities, but on a broader scale: that ethics and governance initiatives without the binding force of law are mere 'window dressing' while unethical uses of AI by governments and corporations continue. Indeed, in various of the countries and regions we have examined, despite the existence of ethical guidelines on AI, unethical AI applications exist, which may fail a test against those very principles.…”
Section: Implementation and Enforceabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this sense, some authors indicate that (soft) ethical solutions suffer from conceptual ambiguity and lack of enforcement mechanisms, arguing that creating strong ethical principles is only the first step and that more should be done to assure implementation and accountability (Winfield and Jirotka 2018). Others believe that it constitutes an ethics washing exercise (Wagner 2018;Metzinger 2019), while others stress that this is better than not taking ethics into consideration all together (WEF 2019).…”
Section: Technology Ethicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While ethics helps us understand 'good' and 'bad' applications of robot technology, it lacks enforceability. They are often ambiguous and are criticized for avoiding red lines, provide 'ethics-washing,' and transform fundamental rights into 'potential rights' (Wagner 2018). Therefore, even though ethical considerations are valuable, 'roboethics' cannot be an omnibus governance solution for the use of healthcare in robotics, due to ambiguity and lack of enforceability.…”
Section: Dignity As An Overarching Concept For the Governance Of Robomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the outcome, he is, however, not satisfied and thus called the overall endeavor "Ethics washing made in Europe" [2], thereby coining the term ethicswashing. Ethicswashing is inspired by the much more popular term greenwashing [3][4][5], even though it has a slightly different meaning. Ethicswashing refers to overstating the role of ethics in a corporation's policy and culture and to (repeatedly) initiate ethical debates in order to (1) avoid or escape governmental regulations [5] and (2) to convince and reassure customers to keep with the company's products or services [1,6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%