1982
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-349-16741-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ethics and International Affairs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The civilian casualties that are acknowledged are accounted for by the principle of double effect. The principle of double effect is a principle that recognizes the moral acceptability of hitting a civilian target when the goal is a military target and the civilian damage is not disproportionate to the military importance of the target (Hare and Joynt 1982). The principle of double effect marginalizes the human suffering in collateral damage by allowing belligerents who intend to hit a military target to injure civilians knowingly in the process, so long as the principle of proportionality is fulfilled.…”
Section: Ineffectiveness Of Nonfeminist Approaches To Noncombatant Immentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The civilian casualties that are acknowledged are accounted for by the principle of double effect. The principle of double effect is a principle that recognizes the moral acceptability of hitting a civilian target when the goal is a military target and the civilian damage is not disproportionate to the military importance of the target (Hare and Joynt 1982). The principle of double effect marginalizes the human suffering in collateral damage by allowing belligerents who intend to hit a military target to injure civilians knowingly in the process, so long as the principle of proportionality is fulfilled.…”
Section: Ineffectiveness Of Nonfeminist Approaches To Noncombatant Immentioning
confidence: 99%