2016
DOI: 10.3389/conf.fpubh.2016.01.00035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ethics and governance in digital mental health research – a joint academic and provider perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although there are no previous studies on ethical issues conducting research on social media, especially for content analysis (Oruc 2019), Bergin and Harding (2016) argued that open-access data do not mean it is legal for researchers to conduct research regarding social media. However, it is undeniable that it presents major difficulties to gain consent from all these social media users while conducting research on social media.…”
Section: Sample and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there are no previous studies on ethical issues conducting research on social media, especially for content analysis (Oruc 2019), Bergin and Harding (2016) argued that open-access data do not mean it is legal for researchers to conduct research regarding social media. However, it is undeniable that it presents major difficulties to gain consent from all these social media users while conducting research on social media.…”
Section: Sample and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Equally worrying is the attitude to ethics by editors and reviewers of academic journals who do not perceive the need to develop a culture of respect and trustworthiness and may accept research using online data collection that applies questionable ethical practices. Likewise, DMH services sometimes lack the knowledge required to support decision-making on which research to participate in, and how best to involve their users in this process (Bergin and Harding 2016).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%