2022
DOI: 10.1109/taffc.2020.3021015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ethics and Good Practice in Computational Paralinguistics

Abstract: With the advent of 'heavy Artificial Intelligence' -big data, deep learning, and ubiquitous use of the internet, ethical considerations are widely dealt with in public discussions and governmental bodies. Within Computational Paralinguistics with its manifold topics and possible applications (modelling of long-term, medium-term, and short-term traits and states such as personality, emotion, or speech pathology), we have not yet seen that many contributions. In this article, we try to set the scene by (1) givin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 133 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although this field has seen tremendous progress in the last decades [1], three major challenges remain for real-world paralinguistics-based SER applications: a) improving on its inferior valence performance [4,8], b) overcoming issues of generalisation and robustness [12,13], and c) alleviating individual-and group-level fairness concerns, which is a prerequisite for ethical emotion recognition technology [14,15]. Previous works have attempted to tackle these issues in isolation, e. g. by using cross-modal knowledge distillation to increase valence performance [16], speech enhancement or data augmentation to improve robustness [12,13], and de-biasing techniques to mitigate unfair outcomes [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although this field has seen tremendous progress in the last decades [1], three major challenges remain for real-world paralinguistics-based SER applications: a) improving on its inferior valence performance [4,8], b) overcoming issues of generalisation and robustness [12,13], and c) alleviating individual-and group-level fairness concerns, which is a prerequisite for ethical emotion recognition technology [14,15]. Previous works have attempted to tackle these issues in isolation, e. g. by using cross-modal knowledge distillation to increase valence performance [16], speech enhancement or data augmentation to improve robustness [12,13], and de-biasing techniques to mitigate unfair outcomes [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, significantly outperforming the MSC baseline system (71.8 %, 11 012 Test set samples) at a significance level of requires at least an absolute improvement of . Note that Null-Hypothesis-Testing with -values as criterion has been criticised from its beginning; see the statement of the American Statistical Association in [68] , [69] . Therefore, we provide this plot with -values as a service for readers interested in this approach, not as a guideline for deciding between approaches.…”
Section: Challenge Results and Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further concerns in this context will discuss legal and societal implications. All of these cannot be discussed here-rather, we can provide pointers for the interested reader as starting points (50)(51)(52)(53)(54)(55).…”
Section: Ethicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next, one must assure that common points of reference for comparison across studies are given, the aim of an audio task is well-decided upon, results are interpretable, and communicated to all, including in particular communication of potential limitations ( 50 ). Further concerns in this context will discuss legal and societal implications.…”
Section: Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%