The contribution of healthcare ethics committee (HEC) members to HECs is fundamental. However, little is known about how HEC members view clinical ethics. We report results from a qualitative study of the moral psychology of HEC members. We found that contrary to the existing Kohlberg-based studies, HEC members hold a pragmatic non-expert view of clinical ethics based mainly on respect for persons and a commitment to the patient's good. In general, HEC members hold deflationary views regarding moral theory. Ethical principles are not abstract foundations but the expression of moral commitments to patients that pre-exist awareness of moral theory. Emotions and proximity to patient sufferance fundamentally shape the views of HEC members on clinical ethics. Further work at the intersection of clinical ethics and qualitative research could bring to the foreground lay perspectives on moral problems that may differ from bioethics expert views.Members of healthcare ethics committees (HEC) are crucial to the success of HECs [1]. However, there are few studies of HEC members and of how they view clinical ethics and perceive their own involvement in HECs [2][3][4][5][6]. The few published studies on the moral psychology of HEC members have relied heavily on Kohlberg's rationalist model-a trend that is reflected in moral psychology as a whole.
The Moral Psychology of HEC MembersKohlberg's approach has been seminal in the empirical study of moral psychology in clinical ethics. However, the use of this approach has important drawbacks both at the theoretical and methodological levels. At the theoretical level, previous Kohlbergbased studies for example, do not take into account the numerous and severe critiques addressed to Kohlberg's approach. Kohlberg contends that individ-