2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2004.01.062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ethical principles for collective immunisation programmes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
48
0
8

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
48
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Lack of trust in the government is quite a new phenomenon in Sweden where previously the government's recommendations have been almost universally trusted regarding health issues. Lack of trust is an emotional barrier that can be hard to regain, resulting in a lower attendance in future public health and vaccination programs 9, 46. The consenting parents expressed opposite beliefs, as they considered the benefits outweighed the risks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lack of trust in the government is quite a new phenomenon in Sweden where previously the government's recommendations have been almost universally trusted regarding health issues. Lack of trust is an emotional barrier that can be hard to regain, resulting in a lower attendance in future public health and vaccination programs 9, 46. The consenting parents expressed opposite beliefs, as they considered the benefits outweighed the risks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants were contacted by telephone by an independent survey enterprise through a random digit dialing method for each city until each focus group had reached its quota for each of the four criteria (global response rate 62%). Globally, the 100 participants were broken down as follows: gender (50 male, 50 female); age (18-24; n = 16), (25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34): n = 17), (35)(36)(37)(38)(39)(40)(41)(42)(43)(44): n = 17), (45-54: n = 17), (55-64: n = 18), (65 + : n = 15); education (secondary: (n = 32), (some college: n = (34), (university: n = 32); vaccination (vaccinated: n = 51), (not vaccinated: n = 49). Focus group participants were invited to debate the following questions related to values challenged through vaccination interventions as well as by the media and public health institution communications strategies: Q1: Did public healthcare messages on civic duty (devoir civique) disturb you or make you feel guilty?…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considerando la importancia que tiene la adopción autónoma de decisiones de salud por personas competentes, la participación en un programa de vacunación (30,31), universal o piloto, debe ser voluntaria, a menos que la vacuna sea esencial para prevenir un daño preciso y grave. Dado que la infección por VPH se adquiere a través de la actividad sexual y no es de tipo contagioso, no se puede argüir para su aplicación criterios similares a otras vacunas, como sarampión o tosferina.…”
Section: Consentimientounclassified