Ethical preparedness in health research and care: the role of behavioural approaches

Abstract

Background Public health scholars have long called for preparedness to help better negotiate ethical issues that emerge during public health emergencies. In this paper we argue that the concept of ethical preparedness has much to offer other areas of health beyond pandemic emergencies, particularly in areas where rapid technological developments have the potential to transform aspects of health research and care, as well as the relationship between them. We do this by viewing the ethical decision-making process as a behaviour, and conceptualising ethical preparedness as providing a health research/care setting that can facilitate the promotion of this behaviour. We draw on an implementation science and behaviour change model, COM-B, to demonstrate that to be ethically prepared requires having the capability (ability), opportunity, and motivation (willingness) to work in an ethically prepared way. Methods We use two case examples from our empirical research—one pandemic and one non-pandemic related—to illustrate how our conceptualisation of ethical preparedness can be applied in practice. The first case study was of the UK NHSX COVID-19 contact tracing application case study involved eight in-depth interviews with people involved with the development/governance of this application. The second case involved a complex case regarding familial communication discussed at the UK Genethics Forum. We used deductive qualitative analysis based on the COM-B model categories to analyse the transcripbed data from each case study. Results Our analysis highlighted that being ethically prepared needs to go beyond merely equipping health professionals with skills and knowledge, or providing research governance actors with ethical principles and/or frameworks. To allow or support these different actors to utilise their skills and knowledge (or principles and frameworks), a focus on the physical and social opportunity is important, as is a better understanding the role of motivation. Conclusions To understand ethical preparedness, we need to view the process of ethical decision-making as a behaviour. We have provided insight into the specific factors that are needed to promote this behaviour—using examples from both in the pandemic context as well as in areas of health research and medicine where there have been rapid technological developments. This offers a useful starting point for further conceptual work around the notion of being ethically prepared.

Ethical preparedness in genomic medicine: how NHS clinical scientists navigate ethical issues

“…This is on the basis that just as emergencies may be unpredictable and evolving, so too researchers and health professionals should be prepared to ‘face new challenges born of the complexity, uncertainty and longevity of technologies’. 23 The concept encourages those involved in particular situation to be prepared to consider ethical issues in situ and appreciate that particular nuances will often not be answered by off the shelf solutions from guidelines or legislation. EP has been described as follows:…”

Ethical considerations in the prehospital treatment of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A multi-centre, qualitative study

“…electronic decision-making aids [ 43 ]. These suggestions may not be feasible in ethical decision-making where each ethical dilemma is highly contextual and therefore cannot be standardised to fit a template [ 44 ]. However, some challenges involving decision-making and DNACPR could potentially be solved by integrating DNACPR orders into the existing prehospital electronic medical records system.…”

Ethical preparedness and developments in genomic healthcare

“…If we further acknowledge, that there is complex moral labour involved in the introduction of new programmes, it is incumbent on us to ensure that healthcare professionals are not only prepared to do such work (both in terms of capability and motivation) but also that they have the opportunity, capacity and support required to do so. 31 Although the newborn screening study is described as a pilot and still in the research phase the Cochrane team highlight that '… a pilot study must answer a simple question: 'Can the fullscale study be conducted in the way that has been planned or should some component(s) be altered?'. 32 33 While we would argue that the question of whether or not all relevant parties are ethically prepared to do the work is a crucial component of such a pilot, this is not necessarily understood or accepted.…”