Ethical Practice, Trade, and Food: Muslim Restaurants in South Mumbai

Abstract

The production, consumption, and distribution of food is central to many religious practices and often considered distinct from the capitalist imperative to market, commodify, and profit. Yet, even scholarship that overcomes the now outdated binary of morality or religion versus the immoral market, continues to represent religion as a distinct sphere of life, with a moral content contrasted or compared to market practice. It is considered an achievement to note how religious practice exhibits affinities with market developments. There is little recognition of how religions as discursive traditions are inseparable from questions of consumption, trade, and exchange, which render the very distinction of religion versus market as an obstruction to analysis. Through an ethnography of the narratives and material practices of two Muslim-owned restaurants in the old Muslim quarters of South Mumbai, I show how different calibrations of Islam are materialized in restaurant spaces and trade practices in the city. Within the context of increasing marginalization of Muslim bodies and food practice in Mumbai, I argue that the restaurants constitute a complex and differential moral economy of food, poverty, care, and aspiration.

Saving Liberalism from Itself

“…Tradition is not only about the past and the future but also very much about the present in which people work out where they have come from and where they are heading. Others before me, and in particular scholars of Islam (Tarlo 2007;Mahmood 2011;Tayob 2017), have done important work in demonstrating that there is much room for reflection in ostensibly dogmatic traditions. I want to go a step further.…”

Emancipating ethics: an autonomist reading of Islamic forms of life in Russia

“…However, Wittgenstein's influence on the ‘ethical turn’ has been wide‐ranging across disciplinary divides. Wittgensteinian themes (like Foucauldian ones), for example, can be discerned on both sides of the ‘everyday debate’, having contributed, via Alasdair MacIntyre, to the ‘exceptionalist’ Asadian anthropology of piety (Asad 2020; Viersen 2019) as well as to ‘ordinary ethics’ approaches via Stanley Cavell (Das 2012; 2015; Tayob 2017; see also Deutscher 2016).…”

“…The Asadian 'revolution' in the anthropology of religion (Ahmad 2017;Mahmood 2005;Tayob 2017), intellectually indebted to MacIntyrean philosophical genealogies (Asad 2009(Asad [1986), 4 has generated a sensitive fault line in social theory by enabling a critique of Enlightened secular modernity as a space of ethical crisis (Ahmad 2017;Asad 2020;Hallaq 2012). Such a move provides a foil for the morally integrated social pockets whose inner workings anthropologists seek to understand (McLennan 2015).…”