2006
DOI: 10.1007/s10897-006-9053-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ethical Issues in Cancer Genetics: 1) Whose Information Is It?

Abstract: This article presents and discusses four clinical cases that exemplify the complexity of ethical dilemmas concerning the provider's obligation to disclose or withhold genetic information from patients. Case 1: What is the responsibility of the cancer genetics provider to ensure that a positive test results is shared with distant relatives? Case 2: To ensure that results go to at-risk relatives, do we have the right to ignore the wishes of the designated next-of-kin? Case 3: Do we have the right to reveal a fam… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While facilitating family communication about genetic risk is not currently a formal goal of genetic counseling (Biesecker and Peters 2001;McAllister et al 2007), some evidence suggests that at risk individuals value professional guidance and support in this matter (Gaff et al 2005). While genetic counselors may encourage people to contact their relatives and provide family letters to help them, the dissemination of family risk information is usually left to the test candidate (Schneider et al 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While facilitating family communication about genetic risk is not currently a formal goal of genetic counseling (Biesecker and Peters 2001;McAllister et al 2007), some evidence suggests that at risk individuals value professional guidance and support in this matter (Gaff et al 2005). While genetic counselors may encourage people to contact their relatives and provide family letters to help them, the dissemination of family risk information is usually left to the test candidate (Schneider et al 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinicians are ethically poised between the rights of the individual regarding their privacy in relation to medical information and the rights of the family to know about their genetic risk [42]. Genetic counsellors ask counsellees to obtain confidential medical information from their relatives, such as the nature of illnesses, and suggest that counsellees may wish to inform family members of their result and the availability of predictive genetic testing, and screening where available, if a mutation is identified.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Year Type of study Journal Agyapong et al [38] 2009 Case review/analysis J Forensic Legal Med Bahal et al [48] 2010 Case review/analysis Int J Surgery Bell et al [45] 2015 Case review/analysis Pediatrics Beng [44] 2006 Case review/analysis Malays Fam Physician Chan Smutko et al [28] 2008 Case review/analysis Oncologist Cohen et al [55] 2012 Case review/analysis J Med Ethics Faith and Chidwick [42] 2009 Case review/analysis Crit Care Nurs Fine et al [20] 2005 Case review/analysis Pediatrics Gupta et al [60] 2008 Case review/analysis J Dev Behav Pediatr Hatano et al [52] 2011 Case review/analysis J Pain Symptom Manage Hyde et al [43] 2013 Case review/analysis Dimensions Crit Care Nurs Johnson et al [14] 2006 Case review/analysis Mil Med Kasman [34] 2004 Case review/analysis J Gen Intern Med Lohiya [37] 2013 Case review/analysis J Am Coll Dent Mueller et al [22] 2004 Case review/analysis Mayo Clin Proc Offit et al [29] 2004 Case review/analysis JAMA Olsen [51] 2010 Case review/analysis Am J Nurs Reynolds et al [23] 2007 Case review/analysis Surg Clin N Am Rinehart [56] 2013 Case review/analysis Clin Jam Soc Nephrol Schneider et al [30] 2006 Case review/analysis J Genet Couns Tully et al [19] 2016 Case review/analysis AMA J Ethics Umeorah and Chukwuneke [31] 2013 Case review/analysis Ann Med Health Sci Res Westra et al [35] 2009 Case review/analysis Eur J Pediatr White and Lofwall [57] 2015 Case review/analysis J Psychiatr Res Youngner [24] 2016 Case review/analysis AMA J Ethics Kadooka et al [26] 2016 Case review/analysis Bioethics Ercan Avci [12] 2017 Case review/analysis Med Health Care Philos Battistuzzi et al [27] 2012 Concept/argument-based article Clin Genet Becker et al [10] 2015 Concept/argument-based article J Pain Symptom Manage Brown [62] 2010 Concept/argument-based article Pediatr Radiol Brown et al [59] 2016 Concept/arg...…”
Section: Authormentioning
confidence: 99%