“…In such dilemmas where the Qu’ran or Hadīth do not clearly describe the proper course of action, principles including ijtihad (independent legal reasoning), 3 , 4 istihsan (preferential reasoning of jurists), al-urf (local customary precedent), and al-masalih al-mursalah (public interest or welfare) may offer guidance. 5 , 6 Ijtihad -generated rulings ( fatawa ), however, are case specific and not globally binding. 5 , 7 , 8 Jurist disagreements ( ikhtilaf ) are common and key to understanding the Islamic legal tradition.…”