Ethical Issues Concerning Vaccination Requirements

Abstract

Vaccinations are one of public health's greatest achievements. However, an ethical dilemma lies in the balance of personal autonomy and choice versus protection of the entire at risk population. Vaccines have become readily available in most parts of the world, yet debates continue as to the appropriateness of requirements for vaccinations, including legal mandates of vaccinations during public health emergencies and more routinely for school entry. This paper addresses ethical issues concerning vaccination requirements in the context of historical as well as current immunization program activities. Five important programmatic focus areas for immunization programs are identified for minimizing conflicts among the relevant ethical principles when developing and implementing vaccination requirements; namely: 1) reviewing and evaluating current vaccination mandates in the relevant health jurisdiction; 2) increasing the use of non-compulsory vaccination strategies; 3) addressing parent/guardian vaccine safety concerns; 4) enhancing public awareness of vaccine-preventable disease risks; and 5) promoting a better public understanding of herd immunity. We suggest that strengthening these programmatic focus areas can lead to a greater public acceptance of vaccination requirements.

A Human Rights-Based Approach to the Social Good in Social Marketing

“…The argument we put forward is that these principles identify the key human rights considerations to be taken into account when developing and applying social marketing strategies and interventions to ensure that social marketing meets its defining criterion, which entails that "the social marketer's goals relate to the wellbeing of the community" (Donovan and Henley, 2010: 1). In many respects, the exercise in drawing a line between individual rights and community interests might be easier to achieve in the context of social marketing interventions, which tend to be limited to one community or nation, than is often the case with human rights standards that strives to be globally applicable and, at the same time, (see Holden and Cox, 2013b;El Amin et al, 2012). Bridging this divide -which is, after all, value driven -is not easy; nor has it been easy for human rights scholarship or practice, and equally should not be expected to be easy for social marketing.…”

Ebola Scare and Measles Resurgence: Mandatory Isolation/quarantine and Vaccination

“…Often, certain ethical principles are in conflict with others, or at the very least, are required to be given more weight than others, when mandatory vaccination campaigns are implemented (23).…”

Health Technology Assessment and vaccinations in Italy

“…Essere certi della sicurezza delle vaccinazioni è un imperativo categorico, che scientificamente si raggiunge ragionevolmente con le sperimentazioni cliniche, ove l'etica trova amplissima applicazione attraverso le regole internazionalmente riconosciute delle Good Clinical Practices (GCP). Poiché ogni individuo è unico e libero e ha il diritto di decidere, poiché ogni essere umano ha valore e dignità e ha diritto di essere edotto sui rischi/benefici delle vaccinazioni, il consenso informato rappresenta un passaggio essenziale della gestione etica della vaccinazione (84). Il consenso non si esaurisce nell'atto medico dell'informazione al singolo, ma coinvolge i governanti che attraverso un'appropriata comunicazione pubblica devono aumentare la consapevolezza della popolazione sui rischi delle malattie e informare sulla sicurezza e l'efficacia delle vaccinazioni.…”