2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.socnet.2020.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ethical implications of network data in business and management settings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
(79 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The force of network visualizations may get around anonymity and reveal identities, or otherwise emotionally affect stakeholders (Tubaro, Ryan and D'Angelo, 2016; contribution by D'Angelo and Ryan in this special issue). SNA research is particularly sensitive in business settings (Cronin, Rocha, Perra, Zhu, Pallotti, Gorgoni, Conaldi and De Vita, 2020, this special issue) and wherever power asymmetries and profit motives may distort the research (Maya-Jariego, Alieva and Holgado, 2019, this special issue). Even the health sciences face unprecedented challenges when they use network data from social media platforms (Chu, Colditz, Sidani, Zimmer and Primack, 2019, this special issue), or when respondents have grown more privacy-aware and willing to protect their contacts (Rudolph and Young, 2019, this issue).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The force of network visualizations may get around anonymity and reveal identities, or otherwise emotionally affect stakeholders (Tubaro, Ryan and D'Angelo, 2016; contribution by D'Angelo and Ryan in this special issue). SNA research is particularly sensitive in business settings (Cronin, Rocha, Perra, Zhu, Pallotti, Gorgoni, Conaldi and De Vita, 2020, this special issue) and wherever power asymmetries and profit motives may distort the research (Maya-Jariego, Alieva and Holgado, 2019, this special issue). Even the health sciences face unprecedented challenges when they use network data from social media platforms (Chu, Colditz, Sidani, Zimmer and Primack, 2019, this special issue), or when respondents have grown more privacy-aware and willing to protect their contacts (Rudolph and Young, 2019, this issue).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cognitive‐, data‐, social‐ and network scientists should contribute to the quantitative development of cognitive networks for studying cognition through social media data. However, these scientific figures should also work together with philosophers and law experts under the umbrella of complexity science in order to provide clearer indications for an ethical growth of this whole new field, taking inspiration from recent efforts in organizational psychology and network science (Cronin et al., 2020).…”
Section: Discussion and Open Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, our sample comprises women bloggers and we do not know whether their social contacts differ from those of young women with anorexia who do not blog. Fourth, reports on the personal relations that young women maintain should be regarded with caution due to memory ( Brewer, 2000 ), sensitivity ( Cronin et al, 2020 ), problems with the attribution of roles to the members of personal networks ( Bush et al, 2017 ), and other interview-related issues ( Feld and Carter, 2002 ; Kogovšek and Ferligoj, 2005 ). Fifth, when reporting on the personal networks of young women based on their narratives, we should remember that these are only the young women’s perceptions of their relations ( Bayer et al, 2020 ; Feld and McGail, 2020 ).…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%