2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.jobb.2023.03.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ethical framework on risk governance of synthetic biology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Social dynamics such as differing notions and rationales surrounding bioethics ( Szocik et al, 2021 ; Bohua et al, 2023 ), social acceptance ( Bauer and Bogner, 2020 ; Frow, 2020 ), also play a part.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Social dynamics such as differing notions and rationales surrounding bioethics ( Szocik et al, 2021 ; Bohua et al, 2023 ), social acceptance ( Bauer and Bogner, 2020 ; Frow, 2020 ), also play a part.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The environmental risks posed by synthetic biology primarily encompass: change or depletion of the environment; competition with native species; horizontal gene transfer; and pathogenicity or toxicity ( Hewett et al, 2016 ). The impact of synthetic organisms or pathogens is also contingent upon factors such as the species which is designed, the nature of the change, the site of release, and the characteristics of genetic modification, particularly when alterations transpire in the toxicity, infectivity, adaptability, and host interaction mechanisms of pathogenic organisms ( Bohua et al, 2023 ). In certain instances, once synthetic organisms or pathogens are inadvertently released, their harm may be amplified through ecological cycles, ultimately surpassing the carrying capacity of ecosystems and inflicting greater collateral damage.…”
Section: An Analysis Of the Safety Risks Pertaining To The Applicatio...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the Biosecurity Law —which forms the core of China’s national biosecurity legal system—has been enacted, and a legal framework for human genetic resources is under development, efforts to improve protection and supervision systems for human subjects in biomedical research and clinical trials of new biomedical technologies are ongoing ( Peng et al, 2022 ; Bohua et al, 2023 ). However, disagreements remain over these regulatory systems’ conceptualization, content, structure, and implementation.…”
Section: Policy Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%