2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-629x.2009.00301.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ethical evaluations and behavioural intentions of early career accountants: the impact of mentors, peers and individual attributes

Abstract: This study examined how mentoring support, peer influence and individual attributes of early career accountants (ECA) influence their ethical evaluations and behavioural intentions. Respondents indicate that their evaluation of the seriousness of the ethical conflict is affected by the perceived standard of ethical conduct of their peers, their personal ethical orientation, the extent of ethics education at university, and gender. ECAs' evaluation of a senior colleague's unethical behaviour is affected by ment… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(61 reference statements)
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although ethics education is being recognised as an essential part of developing accounting professionals, providing real‐life whistle‐blowing examples from more established accountants may also be necessary to convince early career accountants to do the right thing. In this respect, the results of McManus and Subramaniam (2009) are important, suggesting that early career accountants’ evaluations of the seriousness of an unethical act are influenced by their perceptions of the ethical conduct of their peers and senior colleagues. The use of mentoring programmes to expose accountants in the early stages of their career to other accountants’ perspectives, for example, those in the middle‐age group, may be helpful in fostering ethical attitudes and dispositions among junior accountants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although ethics education is being recognised as an essential part of developing accounting professionals, providing real‐life whistle‐blowing examples from more established accountants may also be necessary to convince early career accountants to do the right thing. In this respect, the results of McManus and Subramaniam (2009) are important, suggesting that early career accountants’ evaluations of the seriousness of an unethical act are influenced by their perceptions of the ethical conduct of their peers and senior colleagues. The use of mentoring programmes to expose accountants in the early stages of their career to other accountants’ perspectives, for example, those in the middle‐age group, may be helpful in fostering ethical attitudes and dispositions among junior accountants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As suggested by the Mann‐Whitney U test results, this comparison did not show a significant difference in participants’ PBW responses. Second, following the approach used in a recent study (McManus and Subramaniam 2009) the first and last 25% of responses were compared as a way to better identify early and late responses. Again, the Mann‐Whitney test results showed no statistically significant difference between early and late responses.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, employees need to be coached by mentors in morality and/or ethics, so as to create a common understanding thereof. In a study by McManus and Subramaniam (2009), it was found that unethical behaviour is affected by mentoring support and the perceived standard of ethical conduct by peers. Similarly, new employees entering the workplace need to be coached during induction programmes, so as to preserve strong ethical organisational cultures, which are embraced by all organisational members.…”
Section: Outline Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Schein (1984) unethical behaviour can be learned through relationships with peer groups in which an unlawful demonstration is considered as a way to deal with be recognized in a social event. According to Richard and Hollinger (1983) a person's unusual conduct was frequently concurred or upheld by a gathering, despite the fact that the wrongdoing can be done by a person (McManus & Subramaniam, 2009).…”
Section: Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%