1997
DOI: 10.1007/bf02894347
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ethical correlates of role conflict and ambiguity in marketing: The mediating role of cognitive moral development

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
49
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
4
49
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This indicates that regardless of whether or not the accounting practitioners were professionally qualified it did not influence their idealism or relativism levels. The results seem to support Bass et al's (1998) finding, however, they were in contrast with the evidence reported by Ho et al (1997), andSinghapakdi et al (1999) concerning the relationship between qualification and idealism. The findings, therefore, do not support hypotheses H11 and H12.…”
Section: Effect Of Gender Age and Professional Qualifications On Ethcontrasting
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This indicates that regardless of whether or not the accounting practitioners were professionally qualified it did not influence their idealism or relativism levels. The results seem to support Bass et al's (1998) finding, however, they were in contrast with the evidence reported by Ho et al (1997), andSinghapakdi et al (1999) concerning the relationship between qualification and idealism. The findings, therefore, do not support hypotheses H11 and H12.…”
Section: Effect Of Gender Age and Professional Qualifications On Ethcontrasting
confidence: 63%
“…In terms of its relationship with ethical ideology, while Bass et al (1998) claimed that education did not significantly affect the ethical ideology, the studies by Ho et al (1997) and Singhapakdi et al (1999) found that individuals with a higher education level were less idealistic than individuals with a lower academic qualification. However, neither study found a significant relationship between academic qualification and the ethical ideology of relativism.…”
Section: Academic Qualificationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…High levels of agreement with statements of this kind are associated with what we call radical relativism, which, in all of its forms, involves a rejection of objective criteria for selecting among truth claims. Interestingly, developmental assessments of relativism and its level of intensity are not statistically significantly correlated (Ho et al, 1997), suggesting that a predisposition toward relativism may be unrelated (or related in complex ways) to developments in the complexity and integration of thought.…”
Section: Degrees Of Relativismmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Some of the most cited are the Defining Issue Test (Rest, 1986;Rest & Narvàez, 1994), the Person-Situation Interactionist model (Trevino, 1986), the Issue-Contingency Model (Jones, 1991), the Deontological (norms and environment) or Teleological (stakeholders, consequences, personal characteristics) Evaluation model (Hunt & Vitell, 1986, 1993, the Action-Controlled model (Ferrell, Gresham, & Fraedrich,1989), and the Moral Judgment Test (Lind, 2008). The common tenets of these models and tests are that the ethical decision-making process is multidimensional; that it makes use of the interplay between cognition, affect, and behavior; and that it takes into account individual, situational, and issue-specific conditions (Ho et al, 1997;Wimbush, 1999;Ho & Redfern, 2010).…”
Section: Normative Cognitive Moral Development Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The link between moral reasoning and ethical/moral behavior has produced an extensive research-based body of knowledge generally associated with two multifaceted schools of thought: one lead by moral philosophers and the other by social scientists (Ho, Vitell, Barnes, &Desborde, 1997;Wimbush, 1999). According to key philosophical theories (Cavico & Mujtaba, 2009;Frederiksen, 2010;Kujala, Lämsä, & Penttila, 2011) such as ethical egoism (short-and long-term self-interest), ethical relativism (when in Rome, do what the Romans do!…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%