Ethical Content of Pictures of Animals in Tourism Promotion

Abstract

Based on the animal ethics approaches of utilitarianism, animal rights and eco-feminism, this study reflects on the inclusion of animals in the tourism experience, more specifically, the use of promotional pictures of animals. The aim is to identify how the conceptualization of animals can be understood in relation to various animal ethics approaches and the local culture. An empirical case-study from northern Norway is investigated. The results show that the inclusion of animals in the tourism experience is based on different conceptualizations of animals. Some pictures show little or no concern for the animals, whereas other pictures indicate conceptualizations that are in line with one or more of the approaches to animal ethics. The results suggest that animal-based tourism may have limits in terms of offering a tourism experience that can be qualified as authentic in relation to the local culture. The results also suggest other limits of animal-based tourism, as regards education for critical thinking and ethical treatment of animals.

Sustainability in wildlife tourism: challenging the assumptions and imagining alternatives

“…Recently, some tourism scholars have discussed the use of animals in tourism from an ethical perspective, and some have explicitly adopted and discussed the Ecofeminism approach (Bertella, 2013, 2014, 2017, 2018; Burns, 2015, 2017; Burns et al , 2011; Cohen, 2009; Fennell, 2012a, 2012b, 2012c, 2013a, 2013b; 2014; Markwell, 2015; Shani and Pizam, 2008; Yudina and Fennell, 2013; Yudina and Grimwood, 2015). With regard to wildlife tourism, Yudina and Grimwood (2015, p. 731) investigate polar bear watching.…”

Working Animals, Ethics and Critical Theory

“…As Labatut et al (2016) have observed, nonhuman animals have always been largely ignored by the field of management and organization studies, a situation they attribute to a purported lack of reason and, therefore, capacity for agency. As always, of course, this is not to suggest that non-human animals have been entirely excluded from more general considerations as either organizational resources, or actants within a particular labour process (Bertella 2013;Bright 1986;Coulter 2016;Nocella et al 2013;Tremblay 2002: or as objects of ethical interest, especially in tourism (Burns 2015;Hoarau-Heemstra 2018;Hughes 2001;Fennell 2012Fennell , 2013). Nonetheless, the field remains a relatively embryonic one.…”

Rethinking game consumption in tourism: a case of the 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia outbreak in China

“…Extensive academic research has explored animal consumption in tourism (e.g. Bertella, 2013;Fennell, 2012;Fennell & Bowyer, 2020;Yudina & Fennell, 2013); however, the industry apparently has yet to learn how to effectively manage emerging public health crises potentially attributable to wild animal consumption.…”