2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-31620-4_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ethical Considerations of Digital Phenotyping from the Perspective of a Healthcare Practitioner

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The clinical use of digital phenotyping tools is also thought to have the potential to disrupt the traditional patient-therapist relationship. Artificial intelligence tools are thought to have the potential to disrupt or even replace some of the roles traditionally held by therapists or clinicians [82][83][84]. The use of artificial intelligence methods, such as machine learning and natural language processing, is thought to raise issues of whether the device's findings will be viewed by physicians and patients as more objective than as physician judgment or patient's self-report, thus intruding upon the therapeutic relationship.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The clinical use of digital phenotyping tools is also thought to have the potential to disrupt the traditional patient-therapist relationship. Artificial intelligence tools are thought to have the potential to disrupt or even replace some of the roles traditionally held by therapists or clinicians [82][83][84]. The use of artificial intelligence methods, such as machine learning and natural language processing, is thought to raise issues of whether the device's findings will be viewed by physicians and patients as more objective than as physician judgment or patient's self-report, thus intruding upon the therapeutic relationship.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aside from this, problems arise because Big Data analysis might lead to spurious findings (multiple testing might lead to lots of false-positive findings; therefore, replication of findings is of high relevance-as in other fields of the psychological sciences [65]). Beyond statistical problems, digital phenotyping and mobile sensing endangers privacy of the patients afflicted [57]. It needs to be made sure that the recorded data underlies strong data protection plans together with ethical guidelines in what areas what kind of data can be used.…”
Section: Challenges In the Realm Of Applying Methods From Psychoinformatics: Statistics And Privacymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…What has not been discussed so far is the perspective from the clinician's perspective. Tracking the relevant digital markers on smartphones and other devices covarying with the addictive disorder will help to get insights into the development of the mental disorder and could even result in realtime interventions, when the digital data hint towards an emergency state on the patient side (for exact processes of such an intervention, see an app developed by Mindstrong Health to treat patients with affective disorders as described in Dagum and Montag [57]). In this context, we explicitly mention that this approach not only comprises the study of patients, but the complete spectrum from healthy via problematic to diagnosed psychopathological behavior.…”
Section: The Potential Of Psychoinformatics For Intervention-purposes In Internet Use Disordersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using a smartphone app installed on the personal smartphone of participants for data assessment requires particular attention to data security (for a broader discussion on ethical concerns regarding digital phenotyping procedures in the psychological and psychiatric sciences see [59,60]). Therefore, subjects must provide additional consent to collect data within the app and grant the necessary permissions to the app on the smartphones (such as being notified by the app about available surveys).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%