2012
DOI: 10.1177/0885066611432415
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ethical Challenges With Deactivation of Durable Mechanical Circulatory Support at the End of Life

Abstract: Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) and total artificial hearts (TAHs) are surgically implanted as permanent treatment of unrecoverable heart failure. Both LVADs and TAHs are durable mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices that can prolong patient survival but also alter end-of-life trajectory. The permissibility of discontinuing assisted circulation is controversial because device deactivation is a life-ending intervention. Durable MCS is intended to successfully replace native physiological function… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, device deactivation results in the death of the patient, usually within hours [30,31]. Consensual discontinuation of durable MCS is equivalent with allowing natural death when there is an onset of new lethal pathophysiology that is unrelated to the physiological functions supported by an LVAD.…”
Section: End Of Lifementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indeed, device deactivation results in the death of the patient, usually within hours [30,31]. Consensual discontinuation of durable MCS is equivalent with allowing natural death when there is an onset of new lethal pathophysiology that is unrelated to the physiological functions supported by an LVAD.…”
Section: End Of Lifementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consensual discontinuation of durable MCS is equivalent with allowing natural death when there is an onset of new lethal pathophysiology that is unrelated to the physiological functions supported by an LVAD. Examples of such lethal conditions include refractory circulatory shock, overwhelming infections, multiple organ failure, refractory hypoxia, irreversible coma, stroke with irreversible neurological lesions or catastrophic device failure [30,31].…”
Section: End Of Lifementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[28] Medicare and Medicaid in the US have stipulated that centres implanting VADs as a destination therapy include a PC specialist as a member of the team, due to the fact that durable mechanical circulatory support might significantly alter EoL trajectory (www.cms.gov/medicare-coverage-database/details/nca-proposed-decisionmemo.aspx?NCAId=268).…”
Section: Need For Better Communicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6,15,18,[21][22][23][24][25] It is important to note that although an ethical consensus is taking shape, some ethicists remain opposed to device deactivation in many circumstances. 20,26 It is also not uncommon for clinicians to object to deactivation of a VAD. Usually, the argument proceeds as follows: the VAD is a long-term, continuous, constitutive (i.e., it takes over a function that the body can no longer perform) life-sustaining intervention.…”
Section: Commentarymentioning
confidence: 99%