2022
DOI: 10.1016/s2542-5196(22)00169-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ethical and economic implications of the adoption of novel plant-based beef substitutes in the USA: a general equilibrium modelling study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is due to an increasing world population [ 140 , 141 ] and to meet a demand for lower energy and labor inputs to food production. Success in this matter means sustaining our feeding needs and consists of an intricate web involving psychological [ 142 ], political [ 136 ], environmental [ 143 , 144 ], cultural, economic, and personal issues [ 136 , 139 , 141 , 142 , 145 ].…”
Section: Application Of Green Protein Todaymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This is due to an increasing world population [ 140 , 141 ] and to meet a demand for lower energy and labor inputs to food production. Success in this matter means sustaining our feeding needs and consists of an intricate web involving psychological [ 142 ], political [ 136 ], environmental [ 143 , 144 ], cultural, economic, and personal issues [ 136 , 139 , 141 , 142 , 145 ].…”
Section: Application Of Green Protein Todaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite globalized and scattered information, plant-based foods and plant (and other sources of) protein [ 135 , 136 , 138 ] are deemed to be at the forefront of our interest. There are recent approaches to the transition to plant-based protein [ 136 , 139 , 145 , 157 , 158 ], signaling efforts of the scientific community to keep up with this trend.…”
Section: Application Of Green Protein Todaymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition to these potential benefits, a recent study conducted by Mason-D'Croz and colleagues suggests that the negative impacts on food production or employment numbers observed following a reduction in the demand for animal products may be offset by the plant-based foods sector (2022). If beef production were to be replaced by the latter at a rate of 60%, for example, a 41.4-45.3% reduction in output by the live cattle and processing sectors may be observed, as well as a 44.1-47.1% reduction in employment (Mason-D'Croz et al, 2022). Simultaneously, however, output in areas including flour milling, soya oil production, maize processing, and grain farming would be increased by 43.3%, 20.7%, 16.4%, and 8.7%, respectively, alongside employment increases ranging from 10.2-44.0% (Mason-D'Croz et al, 2022).…”
Section: Challenges and Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If beef production were to be replaced by the latter at a rate of 60%, for example, a 41.4-45.3% reduction in output by the live cattle and processing sectors may be observed, as well as a 44.1-47.1% reduction in employment (Mason-D'Croz et al, 2022). Simultaneously, however, output in areas including flour milling, soya oil production, maize processing, and grain farming would be increased by 43.3%, 20.7%, 16.4%, and 8.7%, respectively, alongside employment increases ranging from 10.2-44.0% (Mason-D'Croz et al, 2022). While a 60% replacement of beef production is not feasible or even recommended given consumer habits and established standards of living, this statistic serves to demonstrate that a transition away from factory farming may not have a significant impact economically or in terms of food security.…”
Section: Challenges and Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%