2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2015.04.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ethanol fuel adulteration with methanol assessed by cyclic voltammetry and multivariate calibration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Selected analytical methods used for determination of phenolic terpenoids prediction is assessed by such parameters as: high correlation coefficient (r), low root-meansquared error of calibration (RMSEC), low RMSECV, low root-mean-squared error of prediction (RMSEP), low mean relative error of prediction (REP), critical analysis of plots predicted= f (measured), and recovery test for the external samples[55,56,58,59]. The coefficient r reflects the accuracy of matching[56], RMSEC, RMSECV, and RMSEP are calculated in[59] as follows:…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Selected analytical methods used for determination of phenolic terpenoids prediction is assessed by such parameters as: high correlation coefficient (r), low root-meansquared error of calibration (RMSEC), low RMSECV, low root-mean-squared error of prediction (RMSEP), low mean relative error of prediction (REP), critical analysis of plots predicted= f (measured), and recovery test for the external samples[55,56,58,59]. The coefficient r reflects the accuracy of matching[56], RMSEC, RMSECV, and RMSEP are calculated in[59] as follows:…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1. The automotive fuels are susceptible to adulteration, which lead to affect the engine, human being and the environment and hence adulteration must be monitored by authentic analytical techniques to avoid negative impacts (Abreu et al, 2015;Correia et al, 2018;de Oliveira et al, 2004;de Souza et al, 2014;Kalligeros et al, 2005;Mendes et al, 2017;Romanel et al, 2018;Silva et al, 2013;Squissato et al, 2018;Teixeira et al, 2008;Vempatapu and Kanaujia, 2017)…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the complexity of the data (usually presenting potential shifts, scatter of signals or differences in the baseline which can affect the PLS performance), different types of data preprocessing were applied, such as baseline (BAS), smoothing Savitzky‐Golay (SMOTH), multivariate scatter correction (MSC), variance (std) scalling (VARSTD), and mean center (MC). Variable selection algorithms (genetic algorithm‐GA and interval partial least squares‐iPLS) were also applied to select a minimum set of variables containing the maximum information related to the analytes concentration reducing the large number of variables obtained in this experiment.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%