2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2004.07.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ethanol electro-oxidation with Pt and Pt–Ru catalysts supported on carbon nanotubes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
32
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…5; A, curve c). The shapes of curves are typical for the electrooxidation reactions of organic alcohols; specifically, there are two peaks in both forward and reverse scans as reported in the literature [56,[68][69][70]. Most likely, the first (least positive) anodic peak reflects primarily the oxidation of ethanol to CO 2 ; in a given scan, there may be some contribution to this current from incompletely oxidized carbonaceous species formed during the prior cycle.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…5; A, curve c). The shapes of curves are typical for the electrooxidation reactions of organic alcohols; specifically, there are two peaks in both forward and reverse scans as reported in the literature [56,[68][69][70]. Most likely, the first (least positive) anodic peak reflects primarily the oxidation of ethanol to CO 2 ; in a given scan, there may be some contribution to this current from incompletely oxidized carbonaceous species formed during the prior cycle.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…On the other hand, although the full oxidation of ethanol to carbon dioxide has a favorable thermodynamic potential of 0.08 V (vs. RHE), the efficiency of direct ethanol fuel cells is already severally limited by the formation of partial oxidation products (containing an intact carbon-carbon bond) and strongly adsorbed intermediates. The great body of work developed in the last few years indicates that various Pt-based catalysts such as PtSn [11][12][13] or PtRu [14][15][16] display enhanced electrocatalytic performance for ethanol electrooxidation with respect to monometallic Pt catalyst. In both reactions, the use of oxophilic atoms can aid in the oxidation of CO from the surface as they enhance the activation of water to form surface hydroxides, which can more readily oxidize CO and CH x intermediates that form via bifunctional pathways [17,18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, for Pt-Ru/ CNT/graphite and Pt/CNT/graphite electrodes, only 72% and 55% values remained. 9 This implies that Pt-MoO x /CNT/graphite electrode is a kind of good electrode for ethanol electrooxidation, even superior to Pt-Ru/CNT/graphite electrode.…”
Section: Activation Energy Of Ethanol Electrooxidationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A catalyst system, which is able to break C-C bond and oxidize the poisoning intermediates (such as CO ads ) of ethanol oxidation at lower temperature and overpotentials, becomes the investigative focus in DEFC. Many Pt-based catalysts, such as Pt-Ru, [7][8][9] Pt-Sn, 10 Pt-Rh 11 and so on, have been studied to demonstrate the excellent electrocatalytic activity both for methanol and ethanol electrooxidation. Especially, the Pt-Ru binary metallic catalyst (Pt/Ru=50/50) was commonly accepted as the best electrocatalyst for methanol oxidation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%