2012
DOI: 10.1017/s0034412512000170
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Eternity, knowledge, and freedom

Abstract: This article addresses the problem of divine foreknowledge and human freedom by developing a modified version of Boethius' solution to the problemone that is meant to cohere with a dynamic theory of time and a conception of God as temporal. I begin the article by discussing the traditional Boethian solution, and a defence of it due to Kretzmann and Stump. After canvassing a few of the objections to this view, I then go on to offer my own modified Boethian solution, according to which temporal reality is fundam… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
(10 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The view that there is some kind of time with God is held by Jackelén (2005), Holland (2012), Russell (2012), Diekemper (2013), Mullins (2016), Peters (2016), Sydnor (2018), Mullins (2021) and Everhart (2021). For Holland (2012), the incarnation of God is a central argument for there being time with God.…”
Section: Impact Of the Incarnation Of Jesus On The Triune Godmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The view that there is some kind of time with God is held by Jackelén (2005), Holland (2012), Russell (2012), Diekemper (2013), Mullins (2016), Peters (2016), Sydnor (2018), Mullins (2021) and Everhart (2021). For Holland (2012), the incarnation of God is a central argument for there being time with God.…”
Section: Impact Of the Incarnation Of Jesus On The Triune Godmentioning
confidence: 99%