2012
DOI: 10.1590/s0100-736x2012001000021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estudo histológico e comparativo das papilas linguais dos cervídeos Mazama americana e Mazama gouzoubira por microscopia de luz e eletrônica de varredura

Abstract: RESUMO.-O tipo de alimentação depende do ambiente em que o animal se encontra, sendo este um fator responsável pela alteração da morfologia, como a estratiϐicação e o nível de queratinização da língua, e a funcionalidade da mesma. Dentre as estruturas morfológicas funcionais da língua, as papilas vêm merecendo destaque devido a sua estreita relação com a dieta. Foram utilizadas duas espécies de cervídeos: cinco Mazama gouazoubira e duas Mazama americana, dividindo-se a língua em três partes: ápice, corpo e rai… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

6
24
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
6
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The tongue surface showed papillae distributed throughout the side surface of the tongue root, at the tongue torus region, with differences in the amount and distribution, differing in distribution in each side of the dorsal caudal part, as reported in literature by Sisson and Grossman (2012). The presence and distribution of circumvallate papillae in most tongues of 26 Saanen goats studied was similar to of Mazama americana deer (KOKUBUN et al, 2012). Studies performed by Fonseca et al (2011) with goats of the same breed and of Mazama americana deer (KOKUBUN et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The tongue surface showed papillae distributed throughout the side surface of the tongue root, at the tongue torus region, with differences in the amount and distribution, differing in distribution in each side of the dorsal caudal part, as reported in literature by Sisson and Grossman (2012). The presence and distribution of circumvallate papillae in most tongues of 26 Saanen goats studied was similar to of Mazama americana deer (KOKUBUN et al, 2012). Studies performed by Fonseca et al (2011) with goats of the same breed and of Mazama americana deer (KOKUBUN et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…The presence and distribution of circumvallate papillae in most tongues of 26 Saanen goats studied was similar to of Mazama americana deer (KOKUBUN et al, 2012). Studies performed by Fonseca et al (2011) with goats of the same breed and of Mazama americana deer (KOKUBUN et al, 2012). As in Saanen goats, boars of the Sus scrofa species have similarly arranged grooved papillae, being arranged only in the caudal region of the tongue dorsum (REGINATO, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A similar formation (two sharply pointed projections) was observed in some filiform papillae of the dorsal surface of guanaco tongue. Moreover, the superficial layer of epithelium of filiform papillae in SAC species consisted of scale‐like, cornified and flattened cells as reported in cattle (de Paz Cabello et al, ), chital deer (Erdoğan and Pérez, ), pampas deer (Erdoğan and Pérez, ), alpaca (Goździewska‐Harłajczuk et al, ), and mazama species (Kokubun et al, ). These differences in formations and topographical distributions of filiform papillae among mammal species appear to be related to age, food, and feeding and mastication pattern (Erdunchaolu et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…The lenticular papillae were restricted to the lingual prominence, similar to other ruminants, roan antelope, and sitatunga (Emura et al, 2011a,b). There are no lenticular papillae in the lingual prominence of reeves filiform papillae, barking deer, or mazama species (Zheng and Kobayashi, 2006;Adnyane et al, 2011;Kokubun et al, 2012). The conical and lenticular papillae aid mastication and the movement of food inside the buccal cavity and may be related to the need for physical mastication of plant material.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%