2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjan.2016.02.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estudo cruzado e randômico comparando os laringoscópios Airtraq® NT, McGrath® MAC e Macintosh para intubação nasotraqueal em simulação de via aérea fácil e difícil em manequim

Abstract: In a manikin, the Airtraq and the McGrath laryngoscopes appeared superior to the Macintosh laryngoscope when dealing with simulated airway scenarios. Both devices were associated with better views, intubation times and rates of success, especially in a simulated "difficult airway". Overall satisfaction was highest with the McGrath laryngoscope. Similar clinical studies are needed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
3
1
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
3
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Both devices were associated with shorter intubation times, fewer attempts, and greater provider satisfaction, possibly because of better visualization and fewer additional maneuvers for better vision. 7 In the present study, they did not find statistically significant differences in the comparison of trial and error rates between CG and EG participants in performing the procedure. However, the study carried out in an anesthesiology service in Turkey by Kilicaslan et al performed a review of intubation attempts and failures using a Macintosh laryngoscope, in which the C-MAC video laryngoscope was used as the primary rescue device.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 63%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Both devices were associated with shorter intubation times, fewer attempts, and greater provider satisfaction, possibly because of better visualization and fewer additional maneuvers for better vision. 7 In the present study, they did not find statistically significant differences in the comparison of trial and error rates between CG and EG participants in performing the procedure. However, the study carried out in an anesthesiology service in Turkey by Kilicaslan et al performed a review of intubation attempts and failures using a Macintosh laryngoscope, in which the C-MAC video laryngoscope was used as the primary rescue device.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 63%
“…Although there is a case for the use of mannequins to improve medical education, 6 a study carried out in A Coruña, Spain, which evaluated videolaryngoscopy in simulators, reported limitations since the mannequin does not accurately reproduce the clinical conditions of intubation, which include the appearance of secretions or blood, being factors of difficulty in routine medical practice. 7 As for the technique performed, all 24 participants (100%) had only used the conventional technique through the Macintosh laryngoscope, evidencing the work carried out with anesthesiologists in A Coruña, Spain, who, despite their area of expertise in medicine, had little familiarity with laryngoscopes. video devices such as Airtraq ® NT, McGrath ® MAC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Airtraq offers significantly better views of the glottis compared with Macintosh ( Table-III ) in our study, which was consistent with previous report. 8 , 19 , 21 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Algumas dificuldades de uso do produto são relatadas durante a intubação, devido a variações congênitas da anatomia da cavidade bucal e das vias aéreas superiores de cada paciente (MATSUMOTO; CARVALHO, 2007;GÓMEZ-RÍOS et al, 2016). Kearsley (2020) identificou que no contexto da COVID-19, este procedimento necessitou de uma nova curva de aprendizagem, por conta da sua especificidade, visto que os profissionais da saúde ficam vulneráveis e propensos ao contágio.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified