2008
DOI: 10.1157/13123286
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estudio transversal español de crecimiento 2008. Parte I: valores de peso y longitud en recién nacidos de 26-42 semanas de edad gestacional

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
1
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
24
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…All anthropometric values were transformed into SD scores (SDS) according to age-, sex- and pubertal stage-matched control values recently reported in the Spanish cross-sectional [17,18] and longitudinal growth studies [18,19,20]. The Spanish longitudinal study facilitated evaluation of prepubertal and pubertal growth using five different growth standards, according to age at pubertal growth spurt onset, instead of a single one as usually occurs.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All anthropometric values were transformed into SD scores (SDS) according to age-, sex- and pubertal stage-matched control values recently reported in the Spanish cross-sectional [17,18] and longitudinal growth studies [18,19,20]. The Spanish longitudinal study facilitated evaluation of prepubertal and pubertal growth using five different growth standards, according to age at pubertal growth spurt onset, instead of a single one as usually occurs.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We calculated the standard deviation scores (SDS) of birth weights considering anthropometric reference data for the Spanish population (14). We considered infants to be large for gestational age if their birth weight was more than 2 SDS above the mean.…”
Section: Clinical Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a previous study by our team [19], the degree of agreement between our model of CC and other models (both non-CC [20] and CC [21] for Spanish infants) was ‘good' (coefficient of agreement: Cohen's κ 0.61-0.80). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…We compared IDM distribution according to the classification by birth weight when using a model of CC [19] and non-CC birth weight standards for Spanish infants [20]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%