2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.rlfa.2018.04.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estudio bibliométrico de la producción científica encontrada en Scopus y Web Of Science sobre rehabilitación vocal fisiológica

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering the large scientific production in any field of science, we set limits to the period of study, as performed in previous studies: previous bibliometric studies offer very different limits, from 67 years [ 15 ] to 1 year [ 16 ], or even 9 years in Calvache’s study [ 17 ]. To use an objective criterion, the average cited half-life was calculated for the 27 journals specialized in the field of Audiology and Speech Language Pathology in Journal Citation Reports (JCR).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Considering the large scientific production in any field of science, we set limits to the period of study, as performed in previous studies: previous bibliometric studies offer very different limits, from 67 years [ 15 ] to 1 year [ 16 ], or even 9 years in Calvache’s study [ 17 ]. To use an objective criterion, the average cited half-life was calculated for the 27 journals specialized in the field of Audiology and Speech Language Pathology in Journal Citation Reports (JCR).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous bibliometric studies have focused on specific aspects, such as the sung voice [ 15 ], the analysis of sex bias in research and publications in the area of laryngology [ 16 ], scientific production on physiological vocal rehabilitation [ 18 ], phono-audiological interventions in spasmodic dysphonia [ 17 ], the relationship between vocal production, bilingualism [ 19 ], etc.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation