2009
DOI: 10.1093/plankt/fbp039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estuarine and oceanic influences on copepod abundance and production of a subtropical coastal area

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
36
0
23

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
7
36
0
23
Order By: Relevance
“…The high biomass of zooplankton on the inner shelf yearround (Lopes et al, 2006;Miyashita et al, 2009) possibly contributes to the development of dense cnidarian populations in the nearshore stations. The salinities o35 at the inner-shelf stations may restrict most siphonophore species, which are typically oceanic and sensitive to diluted waters (Mackie et al, 1987); M. kochi and N. bijuga are one of the few common and abundant siphonophores in nearshore environments, and they may even be found inside estuaries in salinities down to nearly 20 (Nogueira Júnior, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The high biomass of zooplankton on the inner shelf yearround (Lopes et al, 2006;Miyashita et al, 2009) possibly contributes to the development of dense cnidarian populations in the nearshore stations. The salinities o35 at the inner-shelf stations may restrict most siphonophore species, which are typically oceanic and sensitive to diluted waters (Mackie et al, 1987); M. kochi and N. bijuga are one of the few common and abundant siphonophores in nearshore environments, and they may even be found inside estuaries in salinities down to nearly 20 (Nogueira Júnior, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These mesoscale oceanic intrusions cause striking alterations in the pelagic environment over the SBB shelf, with important biological consequences; most of the phytoplankton production away from the continental runoff is dependent on input of nutrients from these intrusions (Brandini, 1990;Gaeta and Brandini, 2006); during the intrusions copepod biomass and production are enhanced (Miyashita et al, 2009). Planktonic cnidarians are primarily carnivorous, preying on zooplankton and/or ichthyoplankton at high rates, and commonly impacting fish stocks through competition or direct predation (Mackie et al, 1987;Mills, 1995;Pagès et al, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, high values of abundance have already been recorded for C. americana in nocturnal sampling (Melo et al, 2010;Pessoa et al, 2014). This subgroup also included the Paracalanidae (Acrocalanus longicornis, Calocalanus pavo and Paracalanus aculeatus), a family of great importance in terms of abundance, biomass and daily production, besides being highly adapted to the oligotrophic conditions and having the ability to exploit other forms of food besides the phytoplankton (Miyashita et al, 2009;Melo Júnior et al, 2016). However, in FNA its participation in terms of abudance was low, caused by the selectivity of the plankton net mesh size used (300µm).…”
Section: Functional Features Of the Copepod Communitymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Clausocalanus furcatus, a small clausocalanid, is one of the dominant calanoid copepods in warm waters globally (e.g., Mazzocchi and Ribera d'Alcalà, 1995;Cornils et al, 2007a;Miyashita et al, 2009;Schnack-Schiel et al, 2010;Siokou-Frangou et al, 2010). This copepod occurs in the epipelagic zone all over the world (Frost and Fleminger, 1968), also in the Mediterranean region (e.g., Siokou-Frangou et al, 2010), and usually dominates zooplankton communities in oligotrophic environments (Schulz, 1986;Mazzocchi and Ribera d'Alcalà, 1995;Webber and Roff, 1995;Cornils et al, 2007a).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%