2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-0981(99)00184-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estuarine and habitat-related differences in growth rates of young-of-the-year winter flounder (Pseudopleuronectes americanus) and tautog (Tautoga onitis) in three northeastern US estuaries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
93
1
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
3
93
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This pattern of variation is consistent with previous field studies in which growth rates were repeatedly measured in nearby habitat types (e.g. vegetated beds vs bare substrata) replicated at more distant locations (Sogard 1992, Able et al 1999, Meng et al 2000, Phelan et al 2000. In those experiments, significant differences in juvenile flounder growth were also measured over short time periods (wk) at coarse (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This pattern of variation is consistent with previous field studies in which growth rates were repeatedly measured in nearby habitat types (e.g. vegetated beds vs bare substrata) replicated at more distant locations (Sogard 1992, Able et al 1999, Meng et al 2000, Phelan et al 2000. In those experiments, significant differences in juvenile flounder growth were also measured over short time periods (wk) at coarse (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In situ somatic growth rates of winter flounder were measured with enclosure techniques used in previous studies of habitat-specific growth for small demersal fishes (Sogard 1992, Able et al 1999, Duffy-Anderson & Able 1999, Phelan et al 2000, Spitzer et al 2000. The enclosures were constructed of 3 mm nylon mesh bags (0.75 × 0.75 × 0.40 m) with zippered tops that were tightly secured within rectangular steel reinforcing bar frames (0.85 × 0.85 × 0.45 m).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Evidence for finfish reliance upon specific coastal habitats as nurseries comes from studies of juvenile distributions (Krygier and Pearcy, 1986;Parrish et al, 1997), food resources (Drawbridge, 1990;Burke, 1995;Wertz and Domeier, 1997), growth rates (Sogard, 1992;Phelan et al, 2000;Sogard et al, 2001;Ross, 2003), ecophysiology (Yamashita et al, 2000;Madon, 2002) and mortality (Pihl and Van der Veer, 1992;Modin and Pihl, 1994). Nevertheless, data concerning the functional role of specific nursery habitat types in sustaining fish stocks remain ambiguous, largely because it is unclear how these factors contribute to the productivity of a stock and affect species fitness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Highquality nursery habitats are assumed to be those where growth and survival of juvenile fish are enhanced and where reproductive potential is optimised (Gibson, 1994). Hence, estimations of growth and condition of young fish are often used as a mean to assess the effects of environmental conditions on individuals in order to appreciate their habitat quality (Sogard and Able, 1992;Phelan et al, 2000;Stunz et al,. 2002;Lloret et al, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%