2015
DOI: 10.1177/1403494815591686
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estrogenic activity of wastewater, bottled waters and tap water in Finland as assessed by a yeast bio-reporter assay

Abstract: These findings indicate that the purification method applied in Helsinki wastewater treatment plant, activated sludge with mechanical, chemical and biological purification steps, is effective in reducing estrogenic activity, and that tap or bottled waters are not a significant source of these compounds to the population in this region.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These observations corroborate that the proposed treatment strategy did not originate compounds with estrogenic effects. Similar results were obtained when applying recombinant yeasts expressing estrogen receptor alpha to evaluate the estrogenic activity of wastewater, bottled waters and tap water in Finnish samples (Omoruyi and Pohjanvirta, 2015). For LDH assay, cellular viability was maintained after treatment for both Caco-2 and hCMEC/D3 cells, providing values similar to those obtained for culture media.…”
Section: Biological Effectssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…These observations corroborate that the proposed treatment strategy did not originate compounds with estrogenic effects. Similar results were obtained when applying recombinant yeasts expressing estrogen receptor alpha to evaluate the estrogenic activity of wastewater, bottled waters and tap water in Finnish samples (Omoruyi and Pohjanvirta, 2015). For LDH assay, cellular viability was maintained after treatment for both Caco-2 and hCMEC/D3 cells, providing values similar to those obtained for culture media.…”
Section: Biological Effectssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…(Ma et al 2005 ; Mahjoub et al 2009 ; Dagnino et al 2010 ; Macova et al 2010 ; Reungoat et al 2010 ; Mahjoub et al 2011 ). The estradiol EQs observed for water samples in this study was in the range 0.4–0.9 ng/L, which is lower or comparable to other studies of waste water treatment plant outlets (Dagnino et al 2010 ; Omoruyi and Pohjanvirta 2015 ; Välitalo et al 2017 ). The detected toxic responses show that this experimental design might be useful when using bioanalytical tools for water quality assessments of environmental water samples, especially for water samples from contaminated areas.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Although the YES bioassay has several advantages, including its robustness, lack of endogenous receptors that can interfere with the response of the cells, lower cost and uncomplicated bioassay procedure, yeast-based bioassays are less sensitive compared to human cell lines (Connolly et al, 2011;Kunz et al, 2015). Estrogenic activity was also below the detection limit in drinking water from Brazil (Bergamasco et al, 2011) and Finland (Omoruyi and Pohjanvirta, 2015) using yeast based assays. The YES bioassay is therefore not as suitable for detection of low levels of estrogenic activity normally found in drinking water.…”
Section: Bioassays For Estrogenic Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%