2004
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0307864100
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estrogen receptors ERα and ERβ in proliferation in the rodent mammary gland

Abstract: Most evidence supports the view that ERα is responsible for estrogen (ovarian estradiol, E 2 )-induced proliferation in the epithelial cells of the mammary gland, but despite this, proliferating epithelial cells do not express ERα. We have examined this apparent paradox by studying the role of ERα and ERβ in E 2 -induced proliferation in mammary glands (measured by BrdUrd incorporation into DNA) in mice with intact ERβ (WT mice) and those in which the ERβ gene ha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
111
3
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(124 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
9
111
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The diminished ER expression must be due either to downregulation of ER expression in ER þ tumor cells or to selection against the ER þ subset of tumor cells. With regard to the first possibility, we found that tamoxifen did not downregulate ER in the adjacent normal ducts (data not shown), suggesting that the loss of ER in treated tumors is not caused by downregulation of ER expression by tamoxifen, consistent with reports in cultured breast cancer cell lines (Giamarchi et al, 2002;Cheng et al, 2004). To confirm this in the tumor cells themselves, we examined ER expression in three sets of transplanted tumors that had been treated with tamoxifen for only 5 days, when the ER þ cell population would not yet be selected out.…”
Section: Wnt-1-induced Mammary Tumors Continue To Grow When Estrogen supporting
confidence: 88%
“…The diminished ER expression must be due either to downregulation of ER expression in ER þ tumor cells or to selection against the ER þ subset of tumor cells. With regard to the first possibility, we found that tamoxifen did not downregulate ER in the adjacent normal ducts (data not shown), suggesting that the loss of ER in treated tumors is not caused by downregulation of ER expression by tamoxifen, consistent with reports in cultured breast cancer cell lines (Giamarchi et al, 2002;Cheng et al, 2004). To confirm this in the tumor cells themselves, we examined ER expression in three sets of transplanted tumors that had been treated with tamoxifen for only 5 days, when the ER þ cell population would not yet be selected out.…”
Section: Wnt-1-induced Mammary Tumors Continue To Grow When Estrogen supporting
confidence: 88%
“…In wild-type mice, chronic estrogenic stimulation, but not chronic tamoxifen treatment, results in downregulation of nuclearlocalized ERa. In contrast, chronic tamoxifen stimulation results in downregulation of nuclear-localized ERb but not ERa (Saji et al, 2000;Cheng et al, 2004). We hypothesized that if the relative agonist activity of tamoxifen was increased by loss of full-length Brca1, there would be loss of nuclear-localized ERa with retention of nuclear-localized ERb in the hyperplasias of the tamoxifen-treated Brca1 Co/Co MMTV-Cre/p53 þ /À mice.…”
Section: Tamoxifen Treatment Increased the Rate Of Mammary Epithelialmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In normal mice, tamoxifen treatment results in regression of mammary ductal structures (Kotoula et al, 1993) and, tamoxifen, unlike chronic estrogen treatment, does not downregulate levels of nuclear-localized ERa (Cheng et al, 2004). It does, however, downregulate levels of nuclear-localized ERb (Cheng et al, 2004). Tamoxifen can prevent progression of ERa-negative cancers in certain mouse models (Osborne et al, 1990;Yoshidome et al, 2000;Yang et al, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analysis of estrogen receptor proteins in rat mammary gland has shown that both types of ERs are expressed and the results from ERα-KO and ERβ-KO mice reveal that ERα is necessary for mammary gland development. ERβ co-expression with ERα has been suggested to repress ERα's function and may contribute to the insensitivity of the mammary gland to estrogen during lactation [31,32]. Deletion of ERα, which mediates the E2 action in mice, results in a rudimentary ductal system that fails to branch out [33].…”
Section: E2 Signaling In Mammary Gland Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%