2010
DOI: 10.2353/ajpath.2010.090837
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estrogen Receptor α Controls a Gene Network in Luminal-Like Breast Cancer Cells Comprising Multiple Transcription Factors and MicroRNAs

Abstract: Luminal-like breast tumor cells express estrogen receptor ␣ (ER␣),

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
174
3
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 150 publications
(189 citation statements)
references
References 100 publications
10
174
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It is worth mentioning that the cell cycle inhibitory effects of ERb are well known (Heldring et al, 2007;Grober et al, 2011, and references therein) and are more evident at relatively higher concentrations of E2 (X10 À10 ), compatible with the lower affinity of this ER subtype for the hormone (compare, for each cell clone, the S þ G2 fraction in hormone-stimulated vs -starved cells). The efficiency of PPT in promoting cell cycle progression (Figure 1d) relates to its ability to promote ERamediated gene transcription (Figure 1b), confirming the direct link between transcriptional activity of this receptor subtype and the mitogenic effects of estrogen (Cicatiello et al, 2010). Gene-expression profiling of asynchronously growing cells showed no major differences between N-and C-TAP-ERb cells, whereas their transcriptomes were significantly different from that of C-TAP-ERa cells (Supplementary Figure S1), confirming previous results obtained in E2-stimulated cells (Grober et al, 2011).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 52%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…It is worth mentioning that the cell cycle inhibitory effects of ERb are well known (Heldring et al, 2007;Grober et al, 2011, and references therein) and are more evident at relatively higher concentrations of E2 (X10 À10 ), compatible with the lower affinity of this ER subtype for the hormone (compare, for each cell clone, the S þ G2 fraction in hormone-stimulated vs -starved cells). The efficiency of PPT in promoting cell cycle progression (Figure 1d) relates to its ability to promote ERamediated gene transcription (Figure 1b), confirming the direct link between transcriptional activity of this receptor subtype and the mitogenic effects of estrogen (Cicatiello et al, 2010). Gene-expression profiling of asynchronously growing cells showed no major differences between N-and C-TAP-ERb cells, whereas their transcriptomes were significantly different from that of C-TAP-ERa cells (Supplementary Figure S1), confirming previous results obtained in E2-stimulated cells (Grober et al, 2011).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 52%
“…The effects of ERb in regulation of the first step in miRNA biogenesis were investigated by measuring changes in pri-miR expression in control (wt), N-TAP-and C-TAP-ERb cells before and after E2 stimulation. Results show that in the absence of ERb, estrogen stimulation did not influence primary-transcript levels, assessed by both quantitative real-time rtPCR and RNA-expression profiling (c9orf3 RNA; Figure 4b and Cicatiello et al, 2010). On the other hand, a slight but reproducible accumulation of pri-miR-23b/ -27b/-24-1 was detectable in ERb þ cells already 2 h after E2 (Figure 4b).…”
Section: Direct Regulation Of Mirna Biogenesis By Hormone-activated Ementioning
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations