1998
DOI: 10.1016/s8756-3282(97)00223-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estrogen and Bone-Muscle Strength and Mass Relationships

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

16
162
0
14

Year Published

1999
1999
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 291 publications
(192 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
16
162
0
14
Order By: Relevance
“…A close association exists between muscle and bone mass (Doyle et al, 1970;Ferretti et al, 1998;Wang et al, 1999). Our data showing reduced FFM and MM in parallel with a disturbed bone turnover in the AN patients compared to the control subjects (Table 1) are in agreement with the findings of Schiessl et al (1998). The fact that there was a close association between body mass, and FFM and MM in our study groups (Table 3) may explain why BFFMI and BMMI were not superior in predicting bone turnover compared to BMI (Results section).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A close association exists between muscle and bone mass (Doyle et al, 1970;Ferretti et al, 1998;Wang et al, 1999). Our data showing reduced FFM and MM in parallel with a disturbed bone turnover in the AN patients compared to the control subjects (Table 1) are in agreement with the findings of Schiessl et al (1998). The fact that there was a close association between body mass, and FFM and MM in our study groups (Table 3) may explain why BFFMI and BMMI were not superior in predicting bone turnover compared to BMI (Results section).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…According to the Utah paradigma of skeletal physiology, MM is the most important mechanical force on bone (Schiessl et al, 1998). A close association exists between muscle and bone mass (Doyle et al, 1970;Ferretti et al, 1998;Wang et al, 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Schiessl et al (1998), more bone mass is accrued per lean body mass after puberty in girls than in boys. It has been speculated that this bone mass is not mechanically needed and serves as a surplus for reproduction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 Although it remains to be demonstrated empirically that muscle forces represent the primary stimulus driving bone adaptation, convincing evidence posits that maximal habitual muscle forces are capable of accounting for most of the bone's adaptive responses. [3][4][5] These research findings indicate that a strong correlation between bone mass and geometry and maximal habitual muscle force exists and posit that muscle and bone build a functional unit. This idea has been corroborated in a series of previous studies in which jumping mechanography was used in conjunction with peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) to estimate maximal habitual force and bone strength, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 73%