Distributed engine control is a hardware technology that radically alters the architecture for aircraft engine control systems. Of its own accord, it does not change the function of control, rather it seeks to address the implementation issues for weight-constrained vehicles that can limit overall system performance and increase life-cycle cost. However, an inherent feature of this technology, digital communication networks, alters the flow of information between critical elements of the closed-loop control. Whereas control information has been available continuously in conventional centralized control architectures through virtue of analog signaling, moving forward, it will be transmitted digitally in serial fashion over the network(s) in distributed control architectures. An underlying effect is that all of the control information arrives asynchronously and may not be available every loop interval of the controller, therefore it must be scheduled. This paper proposes a methodology for modeling the nominal data flow over these networks and examines the resulting impact for an aero turbine engine system simulation.2 the control law and repositioned so that it no longer needs to be encumbered by a harsh thermal environment due to the previous constraints.The control architecture described above is only realizable if information is sufficiently free to flow between the distributed hardware elements. Using digital network technology potentially resolves this issue by using a low weight wire harness with a common interface at each hardware element. The trade-off, however, is a sequential flow of digital data between these elements, leading to an inherent skew in the arrival time of information to and from the controller. Potentially, there is insufficient time to transfer the data. 12,13,14 Additionally, serial communication has no inherent mechanism to synchronize the transmitted information, which previously occurred by simultaneous sampling of continuous analog signals in a centralized architecture. This leads directly to the need to understand and model the effect of the sequential flow of data in a distributed control simulation. The purpose of a communication schedule model is to simulate the nominal exchange of information, i.e., non-fault condition, that occurs between the hardware controller and control elements. This is inherently a different problem than trying to analyze fault conditions like stability under packet loss, 15 which is not considered here.In the near term, relative to a traditional centralized control architecture, DEC technology can provide aerodynamic and thermodynamic engine system benefits, improve engine life cycle costs, and reduce the total engine system weight. These near term objectives tend to focus on overcoming existing system constraints. For example, i) DEC hardware can be more easily configured to reduce engine drag by limiting the nacelle diameter, ii) high temperature electronics can improve heat quality, rejecting heat at higher temperature for more efficient cooling, while...