2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jasrep.2017.03.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of wind-driven soil erosion of a loess-like sediment and its implications for the occurrence of archaeological surface and subsurface finds – An example from the environs of Corneşti-Iarcuri, western Romania

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Archaeologically, this period of enhanced input of aeolian particles and human impact corresponds to the Bronze Age and characterised by key technological developments (Sherratt, 1981, Cârciumaru, 1995. The introduction of the metal plough was the main cause for the greater susceptibility of agricultural fields to wind-driven soil erosion (Goossens et al, 2001;Funk et al, 2008;Nykamp et al 2017). Collectively, the combined results appear to indicate that intensification in land use initiated in the lowlands, gradually extending to high elevations, could have led to higher concentrations of particulates in the atmosphere in this period.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Archaeologically, this period of enhanced input of aeolian particles and human impact corresponds to the Bronze Age and characterised by key technological developments (Sherratt, 1981, Cârciumaru, 1995. The introduction of the metal plough was the main cause for the greater susceptibility of agricultural fields to wind-driven soil erosion (Goossens et al, 2001;Funk et al, 2008;Nykamp et al 2017). Collectively, the combined results appear to indicate that intensification in land use initiated in the lowlands, gradually extending to high elevations, could have led to higher concentrations of particulates in the atmosphere in this period.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Finally, an area of intersecting interest between geosciences and the Paleolithic archeology must surely be the management and protection of finite loess archives (Vasiljević et al ., 2011; Vujičić et al ., 2018). Anthropogenic impact, including mining, agriculture and development, increasingly encroach on Europe's loess deposits and key Paleolithic loess sequences have already been erased, making the protection of their landscapes and archeological sites all the more urgent (Nykamp et al ., 2017; Antoine, 2019; Bogucki et al ., 2020). Geoconservationalists, archeologists and earth scientists alike have largely advocated for the establishment of protected areas in the forms of geoparks fueled by the active promotion of sustainable geotourism (Vasiljević et al ., 2014; Jary et al ., 2018).…”
Section: Gathering Dust: New Directions For Quaternary Loess and The Paleolithicmentioning
confidence: 99%