2017
DOI: 10.1088/1757-899x/227/1/012035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of Vickers hardness uncertainty for a heterogeneous welded joint (S235JR+AR and X2CrNiMo17-12-2)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this case, the standard deviation was between 1.36% and 16.14% and the standard measurement uncertainty varied from 0.30% to 3.61%. For the hardness measurements, the source of uncertainty can be categorized as test specimen (preparation, parallelism, and surface aspect), testing means (measurement for the diagonal of indentation), test environment (temperature and dirt), and the operator [65].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, the standard deviation was between 1.36% and 16.14% and the standard measurement uncertainty varied from 0.30% to 3.61%. For the hardness measurements, the source of uncertainty can be categorized as test specimen (preparation, parallelism, and surface aspect), testing means (measurement for the diagonal of indentation), test environment (temperature and dirt), and the operator [65].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Manson-Coffin equation considers the contributions to fatigue damage of the elastic and plastic parts, in which the relation of total strain range and lifetime N f is expressed by [27]…”
Section: Lifetime Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Manson–Coffin equation considers the contributions to fatigue damage of the elastic and plastic parts, in which the relation of total strain range Δ ϵ and lifetime N f is expressed by [27] where , b , , c are the fatigue strength coefficient, fatigue strength exponent, fatigue ductility coefficient, and fatigue ductility exponent, respectively.…”
Section: Constitutive Model and Lifetime Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• reporting the result. When reporting the result of a measurement, an indication of its quality should also be provided so that those who will use it later can assess its credibility [2,[12][13].…”
Section: Measurement Uncertainty Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• variations in repeated observations of the measurand under identical conditions. In order to establish the necessary mathematical steps and relationships, it is necessary to identify and characterize the main factors that influence the outcome of a measurement and the steps to be followed [ 6,12].…”
Section: Measurement Uncertainty Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%