2019
DOI: 10.31677/2072-6724-2019-50-1-116-125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of Vegetation on the Forage Lands of Gornyy Altai

Abstract: The authors explored the situation in vegetation on hay harvesting areas and pastures in the mid mountain areas of Central and South-Eastern Altai in 2016-2017. The authors investigated 22 communities of various types of meadows and steppes; 8 cenoses were investigated twice. The vegetation of forage lands indicates moderate or high grazing of animals. 2016 was a wet year and it led to pasture degradation and progressive succession. 2017 was a dry year and grazing led to acute pasture degradation and reducing … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, individual publications make it possible to evaluate the quantitative values of the yielding capacity of the communities under consideration in comparison with other meadows in the region. For meadows of the Priob forest-steppe in the Novosibirsk region (bordering the Tomsk region where the BEC is located), the reserves of above-ground phytomass with temporary conservation and light agricultural use are 420-530 g/m 2 [47]. This corresponds to the yielding capacity of both the background communities of the BEC territory and the experimental sites in the second year after a fire.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…However, individual publications make it possible to evaluate the quantitative values of the yielding capacity of the communities under consideration in comparison with other meadows in the region. For meadows of the Priob forest-steppe in the Novosibirsk region (bordering the Tomsk region where the BEC is located), the reserves of above-ground phytomass with temporary conservation and light agricultural use are 420-530 g/m 2 [47]. This corresponds to the yielding capacity of both the background communities of the BEC territory and the experimental sites in the second year after a fire.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%