2008
DOI: 10.1002/cjce.5450840609
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of Variance Reduction Opportunities Through Cascade Control

Abstract: We describe an approach that is useful in deciding if significant benefits, in terms of control loop performance index (through variability reduction), will be achieved by a change in control loop configuration from simple feedback (SFB) to cascade control. The problem is considered in a stochastic setting and solved using the variance decomposition technique. The proposed methodology requires only routine operating data from an existing simple feedback control loop and knowledge of the process delays. Several… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using the concept of interactor matrices, Harris et al and Huang et al proposed the MV benchmark for multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) systems. This methodology has also been extended to different controller architectures including feedback/feedforward controllers, , cascade controllers , and constrained model predictive controllers, and process types such as linear time varying processes , and nonlinear processes. The success of the MV benchmark for controller performance assessment is highlighted by its incorporation into a number of industrial software that are used routinely in process industries. , …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the concept of interactor matrices, Harris et al and Huang et al proposed the MV benchmark for multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) systems. This methodology has also been extended to different controller architectures including feedback/feedforward controllers, , cascade controllers , and constrained model predictive controllers, and process types such as linear time varying processes , and nonlinear processes. The success of the MV benchmark for controller performance assessment is highlighted by its incorporation into a number of industrial software that are used routinely in process industries. , …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the concept of interactor matrices [24], Harris et al [34] and Huang et al [46] proposed MV benchmark for multi-input multi-output (MIMO) systems. This methodology has also been extended to different controller architectures including feedback/feedforward controllers [18,47], cascade controllers [67,71] and constrained model predictive controllers [37], and process types such as linear time varying processes [43,148] and nonlinear processes [25,36].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%