2002
DOI: 10.1046/j.1439-0388.2002.00314.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of variance components due to imprinting effects with DFREML and VCE: results of a simulation study

Abstract: Treating gametes as homozygous diploid individuals, TIER and SÖLKNER (Theor. Appl. Genet. 85: 868–872, 1993) proposed a method which manages the use of available computer programs with a common animal model to estimate variance components caused by imprinting effects. Despite some relevant model restrictions, this approach has already been used in some field data analyses by an adapted version of the widely used DFREML computer program, subsequently indicated by DFREMLa. The main objective of this study was to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More recently, Blunk, Mayer, Hamann, and Reinsch (2017b) reported genomic imprinting effects for beef cattle performance by calculating variance components obtained from parsimonious, sire–maternal grandsire (MGS) models by reducing the number of equations. Various imprinting models have been used to evaluate the effects of imprinting on the quantitative traits in beef cattle (Blunk, Mayer, Hamann, & Reinsch, 2017a; Blunk et al., 2017b; Engellandt & Tier, 2002; Neugebauer, Rader, et al, 2010; Tier & Meyer, 2012), dairy cattle (Essl & Voith, 2002) and pigs (De Vries et al., 1994; Neugebauer, Luther, et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, Blunk, Mayer, Hamann, and Reinsch (2017b) reported genomic imprinting effects for beef cattle performance by calculating variance components obtained from parsimonious, sire–maternal grandsire (MGS) models by reducing the number of equations. Various imprinting models have been used to evaluate the effects of imprinting on the quantitative traits in beef cattle (Blunk, Mayer, Hamann, & Reinsch, 2017a; Blunk et al., 2017b; Engellandt & Tier, 2002; Neugebauer, Rader, et al, 2010; Tier & Meyer, 2012), dairy cattle (Essl & Voith, 2002) and pigs (De Vries et al., 1994; Neugebauer, Luther, et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To model imprinting effects with statistical methods, de Vries, Kerr, Tier, Long, and Meuwissen () first fitted an animal model with an additional paternal or maternal gametic effect. Subsequently, Engellandt and Tier () estimated the effects of paternally expressed (maternally imprinted) genes on carcass traits of beef cattle, and Essl and Voith () estimated variance components caused by genomic imprinting for dairy‐ and fitness‐related traits of dairy cows. In a recent report, Neugebauer, Luther, and Reinsch (); Neugebauer, Räder, Schild, Zimme, and Reinsch () fitted a model with correlated sire and dam gametes to simultaneously estimate for both sexes the imprinting variance of growth and carcass traits in pigs and beef cattle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach has been applied to swine (De Vries et al, 1994) and beef cattle (Engellandt and Tier, 2002). Essl and Voith (2002a) proposed a third test based on the difference between variances of maternal and paternal gametic effects obtained from dam and sire models, respectively. Essl and Voith (2002a) applied both of these latter two methods to data from dairy cattle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%