2012
DOI: 10.1080/09712119.2011.645037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of variance components and genetic parameters for growth traits in New Zealand White rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus)

Abstract: Birth weights and subsequent body weights of individual kits of New Zealand White rabbits were analysed to estimate the impact of direct additive genetic, maternal additive genetic and permanent environmental litter effect on growth traits i.e. birth weight (BW), 15th day body weight (15dW), 30th day body weight (30dW), 90th day body weight (90dW) and 180th day body weight (180dW). The variance components and genetic parameters were estimated using Sire Model and two different animal models. Effect of litter s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
10
1
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
4
10
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The m 2 estimates were lower than h 2 values of these traits. Similar result of m 2 <h 2 was reported by Niranjan et al (2010) in the Angora rabbit and Dige et al (2012) in the New Zealand White rabbit. The maternal permanent environmental variance was also found to influence the early stage body weight traits (W42 and W70) more than the marketing weight.…”
Section: Body Weight Traitssupporting
confidence: 78%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The m 2 estimates were lower than h 2 values of these traits. Similar result of m 2 <h 2 was reported by Niranjan et al (2010) in the Angora rabbit and Dige et al (2012) in the New Zealand White rabbit. The maternal permanent environmental variance was also found to influence the early stage body weight traits (W42 and W70) more than the marketing weight.…”
Section: Body Weight Traitssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The heritability estimate obtained for W42 (0.42) was lower than that found in German Angora (Singh et al, 2008), crossbred involving White Giant, Soviet Chinchilla and Grey Giant (Rojan et al, 2009) and New Zealand White (Choudhury and Goswami, 2012) and higher than those found in New Zealand White (Bhushan and Ahlawat, 1999;Farghaly and El-Mahdy, 1999) and Danish White (Sorensen et al, 2001) breeds of rabbit. The estimated heritability for weight at marketing (W135) in the present study was 0.27, which is similar to that reported by Bhushan and Ahlawat (1999), lower than Choudhury and Goswami (2012) (0.75) and higher than the report of Dige et al (2012) (0.13).…”
Section: Body Weight Traitssupporting
confidence: 68%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Only a few reports (Zhang et al 2000;Kaufmann et al 2000;Solanes et al 2004;Chimonyo et al 2006) are available about direct additive genetic and maternal effects on body weights of individual piglets, estimated using DFREML-based software. Singh et al (2010) and Dige et al (2012) had analyzed growth traits of cattle and rabbits of different ages using different animal models. Simultaneously, for estimating genetic correlations authors (Karacaoren et al 2006;De Haas et al 2007) have efficiently used random regression models for longitudinal traits in cattle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%