2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2015.11.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of uranium migration parameters in sandstone aquifers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
21
1
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
21
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…What is obtained is: t 1 = 0.9 Ma, which should roughly correspond to the period of a sharp cold snap in the region and filling of the paleo-valley by clay material [30][31][32][33]. The duration of the subsequent removal of hydrogenic uranium from the NDD slopes can be estimated from the equation [14]:…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…What is obtained is: t 1 = 0.9 Ma, which should roughly correspond to the period of a sharp cold snap in the region and filling of the paleo-valley by clay material [30][31][32][33]. The duration of the subsequent removal of hydrogenic uranium from the NDD slopes can be estimated from the equation [14]:…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Evidence that recoil atoms are not transferred into water alone but carry away a certain amount of 238 U atoms explains why AR t under reducing conditions usually does not exceed 10-20. This is possible if 1000-2000 238 U atoms are transferred into the water with each recoil-atom 234 Th [14].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations