2018
DOI: 10.1061/jtepbs.0000174
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of U-Turn Capacity at Median Openings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The merging behavior approach is the most preferable method for the estimation of the critical gap when the traffic condition is mixed, lane discipline is not enforced, and the rule of priority is not obeyed or practiced [ 3 , 6 , 17 , 18 ]. The first step of the merging behavior approach is to identify the influence area for gap acceptance (INAFOGA), which is an area, where it is believed that all merging and gap acceptances occur.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The merging behavior approach is the most preferable method for the estimation of the critical gap when the traffic condition is mixed, lane discipline is not enforced, and the rule of priority is not obeyed or practiced [ 3 , 6 , 17 , 18 ]. The first step of the merging behavior approach is to identify the influence area for gap acceptance (INAFOGA), which is an area, where it is believed that all merging and gap acceptances occur.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Te gap acceptance behavior of U-turn vehicle drivers is highly afected by the waiting time, and the statistical result from the study by Shubber showed that when the driver's waiting time fell in a range between 21 and 30 sec, the driver was forced to accept a gap size less than that, which fell in the range of 11 to 20 sec at a confdence interval of 95%. On the other hand, there is a slight diference in the mean gap acceptance between an interval of (1-10) and (11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20) sec at the same confdence interval [7]. In addition to the drivers' waiting time, another researcher [8] demonstrated that gender has an impact.…”
Section: Behavior Of U-turning Vehicle Movementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The calculation framework of HCM [53] delay was adopted in this paper to estimate the delay per vehicle, as shown in Eqs. (2) and (3). However, the vehicle retention problem in the mixed-usage area is an operational risk of the EFL intersection.…”
Section: B Constraints 1) Calculation Of the Vehicular Delaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methods to deal with these problems have been a concern of traffic engineers for a long time, including providing exclusive left-turn lanes and left-turn waiting areas (Ma et al 2017;Yang et al 2013;Zhou and Zhuang 2012;Dong et al 2016;Yang et al 2012) in the aspect of road layout, adding left-turn phases in the aspect of signal control (Al-Kaisy and Stewart 2001;Allsop 1971;Webster 1958;Heydecker and Dudgeon 1987;Improta and Cantarella 1984;Silcock 1997)., and prohibiting conflicting left-turns and setting detour routes in the aspect of road network organization (DePrator, Hitchcock, and Gayah 2017;Zhao, Liu, and Li 2016;Yu and Prevedouros 2013). With the increase of traffic demand, median U-turn intersections (Liu et al 2007;El Esawey and Sayed 2011;Mohapatra and Dey 2018;Zhao et al 2018), continuous flow intersections (Goldblatt, Mier, and Friedman 1994;Yang and Cheng 2017), exit lanes for left-turn intersections (Zhao et al 2013;Wu et al 2016), tandem intersections (Xuan, Daganzo, and Cassidy 2011;Yan, Jiang, and Xie 2014), uninterrupted flow intersections (Liu and Luo 2012; Xie and Turnquist 2011), special width approach lanes intersections (Zhao, Liu, and Wang 2016) and other series of unconventional intersection design methods have been proposed and applied in many cities all over the world, to further improve the capacity of intersections.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%