2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.sandf.2015.06.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of tunnelling-induced settlement by modern intelligent methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These linguistic terms can be organized by Gaussian membership function. The below formulation expresses the Gaussian function (Ahangari, Moeinossadat, & Behnia, 2015):…”
Section: Overview Of Anfis Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These linguistic terms can be organized by Gaussian membership function. The below formulation expresses the Gaussian function (Ahangari, Moeinossadat, & Behnia, 2015):…”
Section: Overview Of Anfis Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike GP and GA techniques that have been widely applied in the field of rock mechanics and mining engineering (Baykasoglu et al 2008;Ozbek et al 2013;Güllü 2012;Ahangari et al 2015;Dindarloo 2015a), GEP is not yet a well-established technique in the mentioned fields. GEP is the developed version of GP and GA and can surmount their shortcomings such as difficulties of applying genetic operators on trees (Ferreira 2001;Baykasoglu et al 2008;Teodorescu and Sherwood 2008).…”
Section: Gene Expression Programmingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their study represented a good agreement between the measured UCS and predicted by GEP model. Ahangari et al (2015) proposed two models, i.e., GEP and ANFIS to estimate settlement induced by tunneling and indicated the superiority of their developed GEP model compared to ANFIS predictive model in settlement prediction. More specifically, in the field of ground vibration prediction, a GEP technique was employed and proposed for prediction of the frequency of the adjacent ground vibrations in the study conducted by Dindarloo (2015a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Suwansawat et al [60] evaluated the potential and the limitations of artificial neural networks (ANN) for predicting surface settlements caused by Earth pressure balance (EPB) shield tunneling and to develop optimal neural network models for this objective. Ahangari et al [61] created a database from previous research [62][63][64][65] and studied the capability of adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) and gene expression programming (GEP) methods for settlement prediction. However, those methods belong to the fuzzy solutions without mechanism analysis, training neural networks requires a lot of data from databases or numerical simulation, and there are problems such as difficult convergence or slow convergence speed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%