2016
DOI: 10.1186/s40623-016-0511-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of total discharged mass from the phreatic eruption of Ontake Volcano, central Japan, on September 27, 2014

Abstract: The total mass discharged by the phreatic eruption of Ontake Volcano, central Japan, on September 27, 2014, was estimated using several methods. The estimated discharged mass was 1.2 × 10 6 t (segment integration method), 8.9 × 10 5 t (Pyle's exponential method), and varied from 8.6 × 10 3 to 2.5 × 10 6 t (Hayakawa's single isopach method). The segment integration and Pyle's exponential methods gave similar values. The single isopach method, however, gave a wide range of results depending on which contour was … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
29
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(18 reference statements)
2
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The discharged mass was less than 1% of that discharged during the 2014 phreatic eruption of Mt. Ontake (Takarada et al 2016). An abrupt increase in VT earthquakes was observed after 07:32 on June 29 (JST = UTC + 8 h) .…”
Section: Hakone Eruptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The discharged mass was less than 1% of that discharged during the 2014 phreatic eruption of Mt. Ontake (Takarada et al 2016). An abrupt increase in VT earthquakes was observed after 07:32 on June 29 (JST = UTC + 8 h) .…”
Section: Hakone Eruptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ontake eruption tephra was ejected as PDC, ballistics, and air fall. Takarada et al (2016) and Maeno et al (2016) document the total volume of tephra and the size of the eruption and Sasaki et al (2016) describe the resulting lahar. and Tsunematsu et al (2016) analyze the distribution of ballistic ejecta and Tsunematsu et al (2016) simulate ballistic trajectory and calculate a landing energy of 10 4 J, essential data for future shelter designs.…”
Section: Geological Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and Tsunematsu et al (2016) analyze the distribution of ballistic ejecta and Tsunematsu et al (2016) simulate ballistic trajectory and calculate a landing energy of 10 4 J, essential data for future shelter designs. Takarada et al (2016) estimate discharged mass of the fallout deposit by a segment-integration method and find a total mass of around 1 × 10 6 tons, more than 90% of which occurs proximal to the craters. The discharged mass of the 2014 eruption is about half that of the 1979 eruption.…”
Section: Geological Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Tephra2 simulation is based on advection-diffusion model, hence the maximum isomass contour area is shifted far away from the source, especially in case of strong winds. In the real eruption case, much thicker pyroclastic materials are accumulated in and around the volcano due to ballistics, partial collapse of eruption column, pyroclastic density current deposit, and direct fallout from the side of the eruption column, placing the maximum isomass area (thickest part) near the source area (Takarada et al, 2016b). The May 10, 2016 simulation result indicates that the tephra fall deposit is distributed toward the east and the 20 kg/m 2 isomass contour area reaches as far as 87 km from the source (near Yokohama).…”
Section: Application Of Tephra2 Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%