2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-6393(01)00040-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of the signal-to-noise ratio with amplitude modulation spectrograms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is clearly seen from the 10/90 percentiles. A similar effect was observed by Tchorz and Kollmeier (2002) to a much larger extend (up to 6dB) than the systematic bias of maximal 2dB absolute in the current approach. Looking at individual frequency channels (cf.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is clearly seen from the 10/90 percentiles. A similar effect was observed by Tchorz and Kollmeier (2002) to a much larger extend (up to 6dB) than the systematic bias of maximal 2dB absolute in the current approach. Looking at individual frequency channels (cf.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The categories 'alarm' and 'babble' includes types of noise, which do contain alarm sounds and speech fragments, but may as well contain additional stationary or instationary types of noise. It is worth noting, that the raw speech and noise material that forms the data set for this study is the same as used by Tchorz and Kollmeier (2002). Also the way of dividing into training and test set is left unchanged to allow for a comparison of the results.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to literature on modulation spectrograms (e.g., Tchorz and Kollmeier (2002)), signal processing techniques for cochlear implants (e.g., Rosen et al (1999)) and temporal aspects of speech intelligibility (e.g., Shannon et al (1995)), the modulation frequencies of interest in this paper are much higher (>100Hz). The primary object is to characterize the relationship of the modulation index at f 0 to other properties of speech, such as voicing strength, place of articulation and individual speaker differences.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Since σ 2 can be estimated during pause intervals (nonspeech activity) between speech signals, we assume that its value is known. A number of approaches [21][22][23] have been proposed over the past years for robust estimation of SNR. Applying these general arguments to the local energy features, we compensate these in the presence of noise by subtracting the estimated noise variance of a subsegment, Dσ 2 /T from the energies of the noisy subsegments, i.e.…”
Section: Hybrid Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%