2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2015.11.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of the prior storage period of lamb’s lettuce based on visible/near infrared reflectance spectroscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The performance of partial least squares (PLS) models has been enhanced by numerous variable selection methods, such as genetic algorithms (GAs), uninformative variable elimination based on Monte Carlo (MC-UVE), random frog (RF), successive projections algorithms (SPAs), variable importance in projection (VIP), and competitive adaptive reweighted sampling (CARS). Variable selection by MC-UVE combined with GAs has been applied in predictions of soluble solid contents in watermelon [17] and the prior storage period of lamb's lettuce [18]. The RF proved to be a promising selector of cancer-related genes [19].…”
Section: Journal Of Food Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The performance of partial least squares (PLS) models has been enhanced by numerous variable selection methods, such as genetic algorithms (GAs), uninformative variable elimination based on Monte Carlo (MC-UVE), random frog (RF), successive projections algorithms (SPAs), variable importance in projection (VIP), and competitive adaptive reweighted sampling (CARS). Variable selection by MC-UVE combined with GAs has been applied in predictions of soluble solid contents in watermelon [17] and the prior storage period of lamb's lettuce [18]. The RF proved to be a promising selector of cancer-related genes [19].…”
Section: Journal Of Food Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[24] According to the comparison of model performance under different spectral pre-treatments, the modeling ranges, and PCs, the quantitative model was obtained by determining the optimum modeling conditions. [30] The evaluation indicators of the model included determination coefficients of calibration (RC 2 ) and validation (RV 2 ) and root mean square error of calibration (RMSEC) and validation (RMSEV).…”
Section: Calibration and Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[22] EW selection can improve the performance of models because a large number of irrelevant wavelengths can impair model robustness, and the accuracy of the PLS-algorithm reduces with increasing numbers of wavelength variables. [23,24] Therefore, the objective of this study is to provide a reference for rapid detection of GBTS with pre-processing of the FT-NIR spectra and selection of the most useful wavelengths. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%