2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2015.05.461
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of the prevalence of asymptomatic pancreatic cysts in the population of San Marino

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, these studies may not clearly reflect the true prevalence of incidental pancreatic cysts. The prevalence identified using MRI is higher than that using CT (2.6-5.4% for CT [ 20 , 21 ] vs. 2.4-19.6% for MRI [ 8 , 9 , 22 ]).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Thus, these studies may not clearly reflect the true prevalence of incidental pancreatic cysts. The prevalence identified using MRI is higher than that using CT (2.6-5.4% for CT [ 20 , 21 ] vs. 2.4-19.6% for MRI [ 8 , 9 , 22 ]).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…ith widespread use of cross-sectional imaging and ever-increasing advances in both CT and MRI techniques, the incidental detection of pancreatic cystic neoplasms (PCNs) has increased, with a reported prevalence of 2.2% for upper abdominal CT examinations and 19.6% for MRI examinations (1)(2)(3)(4). Since a small percentage of PCNs progress to invasive cancers, the identification of PCNs is often a source of anxiety for patients and leads to challenging management decisions for involved physicians.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of population studies have investigated the rate of PCLs both in asymptomatic subjects and in liver transplanted patients. The former 3 , 4, 22, 23 are generally represented by retrospective database studies, showing a high heterogeneity in the prevalence of PCLs due to different radiological examinations and study design. In those studies, the prevalence of PCLs ranged from 4.2% to 44.7%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%