2011
DOI: 10.1080/15287394.2011.534425
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of the Percutaneous Absorption of Permethrin in Humans Using the Parallelogram Method

Abstract: The objective of this study was to develop an estimate of the percent dermal absorption of permethrin in humans to provide more accurate estimates of potential systemically absorbed dose associated with dermal exposure scenarios. Piperonyl butoxide (PBO) was used as a reference compound. The human percutaneous absorption estimate was based on the assumption that the ratio of in vivo dermal absorption (expressed as a percentage during a given time period) of permethrin through rat skin to in vitro dermal absorp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Results from HPLC/FSA analysis of extracted feces collected during the 72 hour orally dosed rat study indicated DBDPE was eliminated unchanged in feces after oral administration to female SD rats or male B6C3F1/Tac mice (data not shown). Rat skin is more permeable than human skin for a number of substances, which may explain the differences in dose penetration (Roper et al, 2006, Api et al, 2013, Banks and Birnbaum, 1991, Ross et al, 2011, van Ravenzwaay and Leibold, 2004). These results indicate that dermal exposure to DBDPE contributes a small portion to the total exposure to DBDPE from the environment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results from HPLC/FSA analysis of extracted feces collected during the 72 hour orally dosed rat study indicated DBDPE was eliminated unchanged in feces after oral administration to female SD rats or male B6C3F1/Tac mice (data not shown). Rat skin is more permeable than human skin for a number of substances, which may explain the differences in dose penetration (Roper et al, 2006, Api et al, 2013, Banks and Birnbaum, 1991, Ross et al, 2011, van Ravenzwaay and Leibold, 2004). These results indicate that dermal exposure to DBDPE contributes a small portion to the total exposure to DBDPE from the environment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To quantify the dermal contact component, we applied the principles of the parallelogram approach to the dermal exposure assessments for both chemicals to estimate a likely level following in vivo human systemic exposures to a relevant dose of dermally-applied FR, as described by Ross et al (59). The hypothesis behind the parallelogram approach has shown data from rat to be within ±3-fold of the values measured in human subjects; however, when studies have been conducted under analogous conditions as part of a matched protocol study, the uncertainty for the predicted value is much lower (85-87).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of inconsistent differences in percutaneous absorption between rat and human skin, it is not possible to derive a general adjustment factor for estimation of human percutaneous absorption. However, when these data are available for rat in vivo and for rat and human skin in vitro , the in vivo dermal absorption through human skin can be estimated from the relationship outlined by the parallelogram method (56-59). Briefly, in vivo human exposure is estimated as a function of in vitro human exposure multiplied by a normalization factor based on the same dose applied to rat skin in vivo and in vitro .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present work provides data to support assessment of risk of dermal exposure of TBBPA to humans. Here, the parallelogram approach (18, 19) has been used to characterize and compare the extent of dermal absorption and penetrance of TBBPA in vivo in rats and in vitro in rat and human skin for prediction of internal dose to humans following dermal exposure to TBBPA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%